Lucky LM studio attempt

Had multiple variants
with and without file level summerization. Needs big context models to work. and han dpicked 5% datasaet collected to work

LM_Studio_chat_v2.py

@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
+import requests
+import json
+import os
+
+url = "http://localhost:1234/v1/chat/completions"
+headers = {
+    "Content-Type": "application/json"
+}
+
+# Initialize conversation history with the system message
+conversation_history = [
+    {
+        "role": "system",
+        
+        "content": (
+    "You are an assistant responsible for constructing a REAL BIDS-compliant "
+    "dataset_description.json file. This is not a theoretical exercise. "
+    "You must:\n"
+    "1. Build correct JSON based on user-provided information.\n"
+    "2. Ask for missing information if needed—never assume.\n"
+    "3. When processing files, analyze only what you know or can infer and "
+    "request more details if information is insufficient.\n"
+    "4. Never invent fields, values, metadata, or file contents.\n"
+    "5. Always output structured JSON or a clear description of missing "
+    "required information.\n"
+    )
+
+    }
+]
+
+# Step 1: Get basic dataset information
+def get_basic_dataset_info():
+    print("Please provide the basic details of your dataset:")
+    # dataset_name = input("Dataset Name: ")
+    # dataset_version = input("Dataset Version: ")
+    # dataset_description = input("Dataset Description: ")
+
+
+    dataset_name = "Brain Tumor Segmentation(BraTS2020)";
+    dataset_version = "7.06"
+    dataset_description = """About Dataset
+Context
+
+BraTS has always been focusing on the evaluation of state-of-the-art methods for the segmentation of brain tumors in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BraTS 2020 utilizes multi-institutional pre-operative MRI scans and primarily focuses on the segmentation (Task 1) of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Furthemore, to pinpoint the clinical relevance of this segmentation task, BraTS’20 also focuses on the prediction of patient overall survival (Task 2), and the distinction between pseudoprogression and true tumor recurrence (Task 3), via integrative analyses of radiomic features and machine learning algorithms. Finally, BraTS'20 intends to evaluate the algorithmic uncertainty in tumor segmentation (Task 4).
+Tasks' Description and Evaluation Framework
+
+In this year's challenge, 4 reference standards are used for the 4 tasks of the challenge:
+
+    Manual segmentation labels of tumor sub-regions,
+    Clinical data of overall survival,
+    Clinical evaluation of progression status,
+    Uncertainty estimation for the predicted tumor sub-regions.
+
+Imaging Data Description
+
+All BraTS multimodal scans are available as NIfTI files (.nii.gz) and describe a) native (T1) and b) post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd), c) T2-weighted (T2), and d) T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) volumes, and were acquired with different clinical protocols and various scanners from multiple (n=19) institutions, mentioned as data contributors here.
+
+All the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET — label 4), the peritumoral edema (ED — label 2), and the necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core (NCR/NET — label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper. The provided data are distributed after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated to the same resolution (1 mm^3) and skull-stripped.
+Dataset Description
+
+All the slices of volumes have been converted to hdf5 format for saving memory. Metadata contains volume_no, slice_no , and target of that slice.
+Use of Data Beyond BraTS
+
+Participants are allowed to use additional public and/or private data (from their own institutions) for data augmentation, only if they also report results using only the BraTS'20 data and discuss any potential difference in their papers and results. This is due to our intentions to provide a fair comparison among the participating methods.
+Data Usage Agreement / Citations:
+
+You are free to use and/or refer to the BraTS datasets in your own research, provided that you always cite the following three manuscripts:
+
+[1] B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, et al. "The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)", IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34(10), 1993-2024 (2015) DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694
+
+[2] S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J.S. Kirby, et al., "Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features", Nature Scientific Data, 4:170117 (2017) DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.117
+
+[3] S. Bakas, M. Reyes, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, M. Rempfler, A. Crimi, et al., "Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge", arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02629 (2018)
+
+In addition, if there are no restrictions imposed from the journal/conference you submit your paper about citing "Data Citations", please be specific and also cite the following:
+
+[4] S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. Kirby, et al., "Segmentation Labels and Radiomic Features for the Pre-operative Scans of the TCGA-GBM collection", The Cancer Imaging Archive, 2017. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.KLXWJJ1Q
+
+[5] S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. Kirby, et al., "Segmentation Labels and Radiomic Features for the Pre-operative Scans of the TCGA-LGG collection", The Cancer Imaging Archive, 2017. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.GJQ7R0EF"
+    
+"""
+    return {
+        "name": dataset_name,
+        "version": dataset_version,
+        "description": dataset_description
+    }
+
+# Step 2: Get the root folder where the files are located
+def get_root_folder():
+    folder = r"C:\Users\lulky\Desktop\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\Non_Bids_Dataset\archive\BraTS2020_training_data\content"
+    # input("Please provide the root folder containing the dataset files: ")
+    
+    while not os.path.isdir(folder):
+        print("Invalid folder. Please provide a valid path.")
+        folder = input("Please provide the root folder containing the dataset files: ")
+    return folder
+
+# # Step 3: Process the files in the root folder
+# def process_files_in_folder(folder):
+#     files = os.listdir(folder)
+#     print(folder);
+#     print("-----------------------------");
+#     relevant_files = []
+    
+#     for file in files:
+#         file_path = os.path.join(folder, file)
+#         if os.path.isfile(file_path):
+#             relevant_files.append(file_path)
+    
+#     return relevant_files
+
+class Color:
+    HEADER = '\033[95m'
+    BLUE = '\033[94m'
+    CYAN = '\033[96m'
+    GREEN = '\033[92m'
+    YELLOW = '\033[93m'
+    RED = '\033[91m'
+    END = '\033[0m'
+    BOLD = '\033[1m'
+
+
+def scan_dataset_tree(root_folder):
+    file_paths = []
+    tree_lines = []
+
+    print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.BLUE}\nScanning dataset folder recursively...{Color.END}")
+
+    for current_path, dirs, files in os.walk(root_folder):
+        depth = current_path.replace(root_folder, "").count(os.sep)
+        indent = "    " * depth
+
+        folder_name = os.path.basename(current_path)
+        tree_lines.append(f"{indent}{folder_name}/")
+
+        print(f"{Color.GREEN}{indent}{folder_name}/{Color.END}")
+
+        for f in files:
+            file_full = os.path.join(current_path, f)
+            file_paths.append(file_full)
+            tree_lines.append(f"{indent}    {f}")
+            print(f"{Color.YELLOW}{indent}    {f}{Color.END}")
+
+    tree_string = "\n".join(tree_lines)
+    print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.CYAN}\nCompleted folder scan.\n{Color.END}")
+
+    return file_paths, tree_string
+
+
+# Step 4: Process each file with AI and update dataset_description.json
+def process_and_build_json(files, tree_summary, basic_info):
+    dataset_description = {
+        "Name": basic_info["name"],
+        "BIDSVersion": "1.0.0",
+        "DatasetType": "raw",
+        "License": "CC0",
+        "Authors": ["Author1"],
+        "DatasetDescription": basic_info["description"]
+    }
+
+    print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.HEADER}\n=== Sending Dataset Tree to LLM ===\n{Color.END}")
+    print(tree_summary)
+    print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.HEADER}\n===================================\n{Color.END}")
+
+    # Step 1: Ask the LLM to analyze the entire dataset structure
+    conversation_history.append({
+        "role": "user",
+        "content": (
+            "We are constructing a REAL BIDS dataset_description.json.\n"
+            "Below is the dataset directory structure:\n\n"
+            f"{tree_summary}\n\n"
+            "Please identify which files are relevant for dataset_description.json.\n"
+            "Also list any missing metadata you need.\n"
+            "Do NOT guess missing information."
+        )
+    })
+
+    data = {
+        "model": "deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b",
+        "messages": conversation_history,
+        "temperature": 0.2,
+        "max_tokens": 700,
+        "stream": False
+    }
+
+    response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, data=json.dumps(data))
+    llm_response = response.json()['choices'][0]['message']['content']
+
+    print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.CYAN}\n=== LLM Analysis of Dataset Tree ==={Color.END}")
+    print(llm_response)
+    print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.CYAN}\n==================================={Color.END}")
+
+    conversation_history.append({"role": "assistant", "content": llm_response})
+
+    # Step 2: Now process each file individually
+    for file in files:
+
+        print(f"{Color.BOLD}{Color.BLUE}\n\n--- Processing file with LLM ---{Color.END}")
+        print(f"{Color.YELLOW}FILE:{Color.END} {file}")
+
+        conversation_history.append({
+            "role": "user",
+            "content": (
+                f"Here is a NonBids dataset, Based on the dataset structure:\n\n{tree_summary}\n\n"
+                f"Process this file: {file}\n"
+                f"Tell us:\n"
+                f"1. Whether the file is relevant to BIDS dataset_description.json\n"
+                f"2. What metadata it provides\n"
+                f"3. What metadata is missing and needs user input\n"
+                f"Do NOT assume missing information."
+            )
+        })
+
+        data["messages"] = conversation_history
+
+        response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, data=json.dumps(data))
+        model_reply = response.json()['choices'][0]['message']['content']
+
+        # Print LLM output for this file
+        print(f"{Color.GREEN}\nLLM Response for file:{Color.END} {file}")
+        print(f"{Color.CYAN}{model_reply}{Color.END}")
+        print(f"{Color.GREEN}------------------------------------{Color.END}")
+
+        conversation_history.append({"role": "assistant", "content": model_reply})
+
+        dataset_description[file] = model_reply
+
+    return dataset_description
+
+
+
+
+# Step 5: Save the dataset_description.json
+def save_json(dataset_description):
+    output_file = "dataset_description.json"
+    with open(output_file, "w") as json_file:
+        json.dump(dataset_description, json_file, indent=4)
+    print(f"Dataset description saved as {output_file}")
+
+# Main logic to execute the workflow
+def main():
+    basic_info = get_basic_dataset_info()
+    root_folder = get_root_folder()
+
+    # NEW: recursive scan + visual print
+    files, tree_summary = scan_dataset_tree(root_folder)
+
+    dataset_description = process_and_build_json(files, tree_summary, basic_info)
+
+    save_json(dataset_description)
+
+
+# Start the process
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()

LM_Studio_chat_v3_file_summery

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+import requests
+import json
+import os
+
+url = "http://localhost:1234/v1/chat/completions"
+headers = {
+    "Content-Type": "application/json"
+}
+
+# System instruction
+conversation_history = [
+    {
+        "role": "system",
+        "content": "You are an assistant that helps build a BIDS dataset_description.json file. "
+                   "Because the file tree may be extremely large, you will receive only 100 items at a time."
+    }
+]
+
+# Step 1: Collect basic dataset info
+def get_basic_dataset_info():
+    print("Please provide the basic details of your dataset:")
+    dataset_name = input("Dataset Name: ")
+    dataset_version = input("Dataset Version: ")
+    dataset_description = input("Dataset Description: ")
+
+    # Authors
+    authors_input = input("Authors (comma separated, type 'None' if unknown): ").strip()
+    authors = None if authors_input.lower() == "none" else [a.strip() for a in authors_input.split(",")]
+
+    # References
+    references_input = input("References and Citations (comma separated, type 'None' if unknown): ").strip()
+    references = None if references_input.lower() == "none" else [r.strip() for r in references_input.split(",")]
+
+    return {
+        "name": dataset_name,
+        "version": dataset_version,
+        "description": dataset_description,
+        "authors": authors,
+        "references": references
+    }
+
+# Step 2: Root folder
+def get_root_folder():
+    folder = input("Please provide the root folder containing the dataset files: ")
+    while not os.path.isdir(folder):
+        print("Invalid folder. Try again.")
+        folder = input("Please provide the root folder containing the dataset files: ")
+    return folder
+
+# Step 3: Load folder content in batches of 100
+def get_folder_batches(folder, batch_size=100):
+    items = os.listdir(folder)
+    full_paths = [os.path.join(folder, item) for item in items]
+
+    # Break into batches of up to 100
+    for i in range(0, len(full_paths), batch_size):
+        yield full_paths[i:i + batch_size], i // batch_size + 1  # return (batch_items, batch_number)
+
+# Step 4: LLM interaction + JSON building
+def process_and_build_json(batches, basic_info):
+    dataset_description = {
+        "Name": basic_info["name"],
+        "BIDSVersion": "1.0.0",
+        "DatasetType": "raw",
+        "License": "CC0",
+        "Authors": basic_info["authors"] if basic_info["authors"] else "None",
+        "Acknowledgements": "None",
+        "HowToAcknowledge": "None",
+        "ReferencesAndLinks": basic_info["references"] if basic_info["references"] else "None",
+        "DatasetDescription": basic_info["description"]
+    }
+
+    for batch_items, batch_number in batches:
+        # Describe what is being sent
+        message = (
+            f"Batch {batch_number}: Here are up to 100 items from the dataset root.\n"
+            f"Total items in this batch: {len(batch_items)}\n"
+            f"Items:\n" + "\n".join(batch_items)
+        )
+
+        conversation_history.append({"role": "user", "content": message})
+
+        data = {
+            "model": "deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528-qwen3-8b",
+            "messages": conversation_history,
+            "temperature": 0.7,
+            "max_tokens": 500,
+            "stream": False
+        }
+
+        response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, data=json.dumps(data))
+        model_response = response.json()
+        last_message = model_response['choices'][0]['message']['content']
+
+        print("\n--- LLM Response for Batch", batch_number, "---")
+        print(last_message)
+
+        conversation_history.append({"role": "assistant", "content": last_message})
+
+        # Store response under the batch key
+        dataset_description[f"batch_{batch_number}"] = last_message
+
+    return dataset_description
+
+# Step 5: Save JSON
+def save_json(dataset_description):
+    out = "dataset_description.json"
+    with open(out, "w") as f:
+        json.dump(dataset_description, f, indent=4)
+    print(f"\nSaved: {out}")
+
+# Main
+def main():
+    basic_info = get_basic_dataset_info()
+
+    # Infer authors from citations if possible
+    if basic_info["authors"] is None and basic_info["references"]:
+        print("Attempting to infer authors from citations...")
+        basic_info["authors"] = ["Author inferred from reference: " + r for r in basic_info["references"]]
+
+    root_folder = get_root_folder()
+    batches = get_folder_batches(root_folder, batch_size=100)
+
+    dataset_json = process_and_build_json(batches, basic_info)
+    save_json(dataset_json)
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()

dataset_description.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+    "Name": "Brain Tumor Segmentation(BraTS2020)",
+    "BIDSVersion": "1.0.0",
+    "DatasetType": "raw",
+    "License": "CC0",
+    "Authors": [
+        "Author1"
+    ],
+    "DatasetDescription": "About Dataset\nContext\n\nBraTS has always been focusing on the evaluation of state-of-the-art methods for the segmentation of brain tumors in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BraTS 2020 utilizes multi-institutional pre-operative MRI scans and primarily focuses on the segmentation (Task 1) of intrinsically heterogeneous (in appearance, shape, and histology) brain tumors, namely gliomas. Furthemore, to pinpoint the clinical relevance of this segmentation task, BraTS\u201920 also focuses on the prediction of patient overall survival (Task 2), and the distinction between pseudoprogression and true tumor recurrence (Task 3), via integrative analyses of radiomic features and machine learning algorithms. Finally, BraTS'20 intends to evaluate the algorithmic uncertainty in tumor segmentation (Task 4).\nTasks' Description and Evaluation Framework\n\nIn this year's challenge, 4 reference standards are used for the 4 tasks of the challenge:\n\n    Manual segmentation labels of tumor sub-regions,\n    Clinical data of overall survival,\n    Clinical evaluation of progression status,\n    Uncertainty estimation for the predicted tumor sub-regions.\n\nImaging Data Description\n\nAll BraTS multimodal scans are available as NIfTI files (.nii.gz) and describe a) native (T1) and b) post-contrast T1-weighted (T1Gd), c) T2-weighted (T2), and d) T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) volumes, and were acquired with different clinical protocols and various scanners from multiple (n=19) institutions, mentioned as data contributors here.\n\nAll the imaging datasets have been segmented manually, by one to four raters, following the same annotation protocol, and their annotations were approved by experienced neuro-radiologists. Annotations comprise the GD-enhancing tumor (ET \u2014 label 4), the peritumoral edema (ED \u2014 label 2), and the necrotic and non-enhancing tumor core (NCR/NET \u2014 label 1), as described both in the BraTS 2012-2013 TMI paper and in the latest BraTS summarizing paper. The provided data are distributed after their pre-processing, i.e., co-registered to the same anatomical template, interpolated to the same resolution (1 mm^3) and skull-stripped.\nDataset Description\n\nAll the slices of volumes have been converted to hdf5 format for saving memory. Metadata contains volume_no, slice_no , and target of that slice.\nUse of Data Beyond BraTS\n\nParticipants are allowed to use additional public and/or private data (from their own institutions) for data augmentation, only if they also report results using only the BraTS'20 data and discuss any potential difference in their papers and results. This is due to our intentions to provide a fair comparison among the participating methods.\nData Usage Agreement / Citations:\n\nYou are free to use and/or refer to the BraTS datasets in your own research, provided that you always cite the following three manuscripts:\n\n[1] B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, et al. \"The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)\", IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34(10), 1993-2024 (2015) DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694\n\n[2] S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J.S. Kirby, et al., \"Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features\", Nature Scientific Data, 4:170117 (2017) DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.117\n\n[3] S. Bakas, M. Reyes, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, M. Rempfler, A. Crimi, et al., \"Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge\", arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02629 (2018)\n\nIn addition, if there are no restrictions imposed from the journal/conference you submit your paper about citing \"Data Citations\", please be specific and also cite the following:\n\n[4] S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. Kirby, et al., \"Segmentation Labels and Radiomic Features for the Pre-operative Scans of the TCGA-GBM collection\", The Cancer Imaging Archive, 2017. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.KLXWJJ1Q\n\n[5] S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. Kirby, et al., \"Segmentation Labels and Radiomic Features for the Pre-operative Scans of the TCGA-LGG collection\", The Cancer Imaging Archive, 2017. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.GJQ7R0EF\"\n    \n",
+    "C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\meta_data.csv": "<think>\nFirst, I need to analyze the provided meta_data.csv file from the dataset directory structure.\n\nThe file path given is: C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\meta_data.csv\n\nBut I don't have access to the actual content of meta_data.csv. The system prompt says: \"When processing files, analyze only what you know or can infer and request more details if information is insufficient.\"\n\nI know that BIDS requires specific metadata in dataset_description.json based on file contents and directory structure. Since I cannot access the file contents, I must base my analysis solely on the filename and its potential role.\n\nmeta_data.csv: From the directory structure provided earlier, this might be a typo or alternative name for meta_data.csv. In standard BIDS, common files include metadata in CSV format under derivatives or elsewhere, but it's not directly part of dataset_description.json unless specified.\n\nname_mapping.csv: This could be relevant for mapping file names to more descriptive ones, which is useful for BIDS datasets.\n\nsurvival_info.csv: Similar to meta_data.csv and name_mapping.csv, this might contain specific metadata about survival data. In BIDS, there's an extension for longitudinal or survival analysis with the use of _survival_time.tsv and _events.tsv files in certain directories, but here it's a CSV file at the root.\n\nvolume_*.h5: These are image files stored in HDF5 format. For BIDS compliance, I need to know what modality they represent (e.g., T1, FLAIR) and other details like subject IDs, sessions, etc.\n\nBut the user provided a dataset directory structure with these files, so I should consider which ones can contribute metadata for dataset_description.json.\n\nRelevant Files for dataset_description.json:\n- meta_data.csv: This might contain general dataset information.\n- name_mapping.csv: Could provide mapping of file names to more descriptive names.\n- survival_info.csv: Might have specific info about survival data.\n- The h5 files are the actual imaging data, but their metadata should be inferred from BIDS entities like subject and session.\n\nHowever, I don't know what's inside these CSV files. They might contain important information for dataset_description.json, such as:\n- Dataset name\n- Description\n- Authors\n- License\n- How to cite\n\nBut the system prompt says: \"Never invent fields, values, metadata or file contents.\" So I cannot assume any content.\n\nI need to ask for missing information if needed. The required BIDS-compliant dataset_description.json must have certain keys like \"Name\", \"Description\", etc., but these are not provided in the directory structure alone.\n\nFrom standard BIDS requirements:\n- Required fields: Name, Description, Authors (if multiple), License(s), References_and_collaborations, Dataset description.\n- Optional fields include Maintainers, How to cite, Institutions, etc.\n\nBut I don't have any information about:\n- What is the dataset name?\n- What is a brief description of the dataset?\n- Who are the authors or creators?\n- What license does it use? (e.g., Apache 2.0)\n- Any references or collaborations?\n\nAlso, for the imaging data files, BIDS requires specific file naming and metadata. The h5 files might be containing MRI volumes, but",
+    "C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\name_mapping.csv": "<think>\nFirst, I'm analyzing the provided directory structure again:\n\n```\ncontent/\n    data/\n        meta_data.csv   # Note: This might be a typo or alternative; in BIDS, common files are like participants.tsv etc.\n        name_mapping.csv\n        survival_info.csv  # Probably meant to be survival_info.csv from previous message?\n        volume_1_slice_0.h5\n        volume_1_slice_1.h5\n        volume_1_slice_2.h5\n```\n\nThe user mentioned \"meta_data.csv\" in the first part, but now it's listed as \"meta_data.csv\". I need to stick with what's provided.\n\nNow, for name_mapping.csv: This file is typically used in BIDS datasets to map from non-standard names to standard ones. It could be relevant if we have files that don't follow standard naming conventions and need mapping.\n\nBut without knowing the contents of meta_data.csv or name_mapping.csv, I cannot assume what they contain. The system prompt says never to invent fields or values.\n\nRelevant Files for dataset_description.json:\n- meta_data.csv: Might contain general metadata about the dataset.\n- name_mapping.csv: Could be used for BIDS compliance by mapping file names to standard ones.\n- survival_info.csv: Likely contains information about survival data, which might not directly fit into dataset_description.json unless specified.\n\nThe h5 files are imaging data. For BIDS compliance, I need to know what modality they represent and other details like subject IDs, sessions, etc., but the directory structure doesn't show any subjects or sessions organized in standard BIDS subdirectories (like sub-01/).\n\nStandard BIDS requires:\n- A root level with dataset_description.json\n- Subdirectories for subjects: sub-[subject_id]/ses-[session_id]/\n- Files within those should follow specific naming conventions.\n\nHere, the files are all under data/, which is not standard. In a proper BIDS dataset, imaging and other files should be organized in subject-specific directories or sessions.\n\nTherefore, I need to request more information about how these files relate to subjects and sessions.\n\nMissing metadata:\n- Dataset name\n- Description of the dataset\n- Authors (or creators)\n- License(s) with URL and conditions if any\n- How to cite\n\nAlso, for the imaging data, BIDS requires specific extensions based on modality. The h5 files might be containing MRI volumes or something else? I don't know.\n\nThe user said \"volume_1_slice_0.h5\", which suggests that these are volume/slice combinations, but in BIDS, we need to have subjects and sessions defined properly.\n</think>\nBased on the provided dataset directory structure:\n\n```\ncontent/\n    data/\n        meta_data.csv\n        name_mapping.csv\n        survival_info.csv\n        volume_1_slice_0.h5\n        volume_1_slice_1.h5\n        volume_1_slice_2.h5\n```\n\nI have identified that `meta_data.csv`, `name_mapping.csv`, and `survival_info.csv` are likely to be relevant for dataset_description.json, as they contain metadata. However, I cannot assume the contents of these files or any other details.\n\nSpecifically:\n\n- **meta_data.csv**: This file is typically used in BIDS datasets to store general metadata about the dataset.\n- **name_mapping.csv**: Used for mapping non-standard names to standard ones (e.g.,",
+    "C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\survival_info.csv": "<think>\nFirst, I'm looking at the user's query where they provided a directory structure for what should be a REAL BIDS-compliant dataset_description.json file. The files listed are:\n- meta_data.csv\n- name_mapping.csv\n- survival_info.csv (which seems to be misspelled as \"survival_info.csv\" in this message, but I'll use the given filename)\n- volume_1_slice_0.h5\n- volume_1_slice_1.h5\n- volume_1_slice_2.h5\n\nThe user is now asking about survival_info.csv (or whatever it's called here), and to process that file without knowing its contents.\n\nMy role requires me to construct a BIDS-compliant dataset_description.json, but I can't access the actual files or their contents. So for each file, I need to analyze what I know from the filename and infer if possible, but never invent information.\n\nThe system prompt says: \"When processing files, analyze only what you know or can infer and request more details if information is insufficient.\"\n\nI don't have any knowledge about the content of survival_info.csv. It could contain various types of metadata, such as:\n- Survival times for subjects\n- Event-related data (like time to event)\n- Cohort information\n\nBut I cannot assume what it contains; I must ask for missing information.\n\nFor dataset_description.json, BIDS requires certain fields like \"Name\", \"Description\", etc. But the user hasn't provided any of that yet.\n\nIn this case, the file survival_info.csv might be relevant because:\n- In a medical imaging context (given the .h5 files and terms like volume), it could contain information about patient outcomes or follow-up data.\n- However, I don't know for sure without looking at its content.\n\nThe system prompt says: \"Never invent fields, values, metadata, or file contents.\" So I cannot guess what's in survival_info.csv. It might be a CSV containing columns like:\n- subject_id\n- slice_number\n- time_points\n- event_time\n\nBut again, I don't know the actual content.\n\nI need to identify which files are relevant for dataset_description.json and list any missing metadata needed.\n\nFrom BIDS specification, required fields in dataset_description.json include:\n- \"Name\"\n- \"Description\"\n- \"Authors\" (if multiple)\n- \"Licenses\"\n- \"References_and_collaborations\"\n\nOptional but recommended: \"How to cite\", \"Maintainers\", etc.\n\nFiles that might be relevant for dataset_description.json are those that contain metadata about the dataset, not necessarily the data files themselves. The BIDS specification says:\n- meta_data.csv is a standard file for general metadata.\n- name_mapping.csv can provide information for Name field if it's mapping to standard names.\n- survival_info.csv (or similar) might be used in extensions like for longitudinal studies.\n\nBut I need to build dataset_description.json based on user-provided info, and ask for missing data.\n\nThe directory structure shows:\ncontent/\n    data/\n        meta_data.csv\n        name_mapping.csv\n        survival_info.csv  // this is the one we're processing now\n\nI should list which files are relevant. Based on BIDS conventions:\n\n- meta_data.csv: This could be a source of dataset-level metadata.\n- name_mapping.csv: Might provide mappings for file names, useful for standardization.\n- survival_info.csv: Likely contains information about survival data",
+    "C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\volume_1_slice_0.h5": "<think>\nOkay, let's tackle this step by step based on the provided directory structure.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what a BIDS-compliant dataset_description.json file requires. The BIDS specification outlines specific fields that must be included if certain files are present in the dataset. These include:\n- \"Name\"\n- \"Description\"\n- \"Authors\" (if multiple)\n- \"Acknowledgements\" (optional but recommended for collaborations or funding)\n- \"Licenses\": This should have a list of license objects with URL and conditions.\n- \"References_and_collaborations\"\n- \"How to cite\"\n\nNow, looking at the dataset directory structure provided:\n\ncontent/\n    data/\n        meta_data.csv\n        name_mapping.csv\n        survival_info.csv\n        volume_1_slice_0.h5\n        volume_1_slice_1.h5\n        volume_1_slice_2.h5\n\nFrom this, I can infer that:\n- The dataset is likely related to neuroimaging since there are files like volume_x_slice_y.h5.\n- There's a meta_data.csv which might contain general metadata.\n- name_mapping.csv could be for mapping file names or IDs to standard BIDS entities.\n- survival_info.csv probably contains information about patient survival times, possibly for longitudinal studies.\n\nBut I don't have the contents of these CSV files. The system prompt says: \"Never assume\" and \"Do NOT guess missing information.\" So I cannot make any assumptions about what's inside them unless explicitly provided.\n\nFor dataset_description.json:\n- It should be in the root directory.\n- Required fields include Name, Description, Authors (if multiple), License(s), References_and_collaborations, Dataset description.\n\nThe user didn't provide any of these. Therefore, I need to ask for missing information.\n\nAlso, regarding the files themselves: volume_1_slice_0.h5 etc., they are likely containing imaging data but in HDF5 format which is not standard BIDS. BIDS typically uses NIfTI or DICOM derivatives with sidecar JSON files. However, since this is a REAL dataset, I must stick to what's provided.\n\nThe system prompt says: \"When processing files, analyze only what you know or can infer and request more details if information is insufficient.\"\n\nI don't have access to the contents of volume_1_slice_0.h5, so I cannot determine its format or content. But from the filename, it seems like a volumetric image file with multiple slices.\n\nTherefore, for dataset_description.json:\n- Name: Not provided.\n- Description: Not provided.\n- Authors: Not specified if there are any authors.\n- License: Not provided.\n- References_and_collaborations: Not provided.\n- Dataset description (the \"Dataset description\" field): This is required and should be a string describing the dataset.\n\nAdditionally, I need to check for other BIDS-compliant fields. But since no subjects or sessions are mentioned in the directory structure, there might not be any subject-specific data yet. The files like meta_data.csv etc., could potentially provide some of this information if they contain it.\n\nBut again, without knowing their contents, I can't use them directly for dataset_description.json unless explicitly stated by the user that these CSVs are part of BIDS metadata.\n\nThe system prompt says: \"Ask for missing information if needed\u2014never assume.\" So I should list any required fields that aren't provided.\n\nRequired fields from BIDS specification:\n- Name",
+    "C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\volume_1_slice_1.h5": "<think>\nOkay, let's break this down.\n\nFirst, I need to understand what the user has provided. They're asking me to construct a BIDS-compliant dataset_description.json file for their dataset based on the given directory structure. The files listed are meta_data.csv, name_mapping.csv, survival_info.csv, and several HDF5 files named volume_1_slice_x.h5.\n\nI know from my previous response that I need to build correct JSON without guessing or inventing information. So, I should stick strictly to what's provided in the directory structure and ask for missing details.\n\nThe user mentioned \"REAL BIDS-compliant,\" so they're serious about ensuring compliance. That means I can't make assumptions. They emphasized not to guess anything\u2014only output JSON if all required info is present or describe missing information clearly.\n\nNow, looking at the dataset_description.json file requirements:\n\n1. **Identify relevant files**: The standard BIDS dataset requires certain fields in the dataset_description.json, such as Name, Description, Authors, License, References_and_collaborations, etc. But I don't have any of these yet. So I need to ask for them.\n\n2. **Ask for missing information if needed** - Never assume anything. The user hasn't provided details about the dataset's name, description, authors, license, references, survival data, or demographics. These are all required fields in BIDS datasets but not present here.\n\n3. When processing files, I should analyze only what I know and request more if insufficient. For example, the HDF5 files might contain some metadata like modality, but without knowing their contents, I can't infer much beyond the file names or extensions.\n\nThe directory structure shows that all the data files are in a single entity called \"data\" under the meta/ folder. The BIDS specification requires specific conventions for dataset_description.json, so I need to ensure that the JSON is accurate and not guess anything.\n\nNow, looking at the files:\n- meta_data.csv: This might contain metadata about the dataset.\n- name_mapping.csv: Could be used for mapping file names or IDs.\n- survival_info.csv: Probably contains information about patient survival times or outcomes.\n- volume_1_slice_x.h5: These are likely image data in HDF5 format.\n\nBut I need to check if these files are relevant. The user provided a directory structure, but didn't specify the exact location of dataset_description.json. According to BIDS, dataset_description.json should be at the root of the dataset, not inside data/ or other subdirectories. So perhaps the content is in the parent directories.\n\nThe system prompt says: \"Also list any missing metadata you need.\" I need to ask for missing info if needed and never assume anything. The user hasn't provided details about:\n- Authorship\n- Description of the dataset\n- License information\n- Survival or survival data structure (like longitudinal, behavioral, etc.)\n\nI should not guess or invent fields. For instance, the Name field is required but isn't specified here. I need to ask for it.\n\nAlso, the user might have provided meta_data.csv and name_mapping.csv which could be relevant if they are part of BIDS metadata. But without knowing their contents, I can't use them directly unless explicitly stated by the user.\n\nThe system prompt emphasizes not to guess missing information. So I must only include what's necessary and ask for more details when needed.\n\nFor dataset_description.json, required fields",
+    "C:\\Users\\lulky\\Desktop\\AI-assisted-Neuroimaging-harmonization\\Non_Bids_Dataset\\archive\\BraTS2020_training_data\\content\\data\\volume_1_slice_2.h5": "<think>\nOkay, I need to identify which files are relevant for dataset_description.json.\n\n I know that in a typical BIDS-compliant dataset, the dataset directory structure should have more standardization. The content provided includes meta_data.csv, name_mapping.csv, survival_info.csv, and other CSVs like survival_info.csv etc., but without their contents, I can't determine specific metadata or file-level info.\n</think>\nOkay, let's construct the JSON for a BIDS-compliant dataset_description.json.\n\nThe user wants to construct a REAL dataset_description.json. The directory structure provided is:\n\ncontent/\n    data/\n        meta_data.csv\n        name_mapping.h5\n        volume_1_slice_0.nii.gz\n        volume_1_slice_0.h5\n        etc.\n\nI need to identify relevant files and list missing metadata for the BIDS-comp\n\nWait, I must build a dataset_description.json file that is actually compliant with BIDS standards. This is not theoretical; it's a practical task. The user provided directory structure shows:\n\ncontent/\n    data/\n        meta_data.csv\n        name_mapping.csv\n        survival_info.h5\n        volume_1_slice_0.h5\n\nThe system prompt says to analyze only what I know or can infer and request more details if insufficient.\n\nFirst, the dataset_description.json file is required for BIDS compliance. It's a JSON file that describes metadata about the dataset, not the actual data but rather information inferred from existing files.\n</think>\n```json\n{\n  \"Name\": \"Constructing a REAL BIDS dataset_description.json\",\n    \"name_mapping.csv\"\n        \"SurvivalInfo\" field is missing in survival_info.h5 and meta_data.csv. I need to construct a correct JSON based on the user's provided information.\n\nThe system prompt says: \"Also list any missing metadata you need.\" So, I should ask for more details if needed\u2014never assume.\n</think>\n```json\n{\n  \"Name\": \"BIDS dataset must have a field called Name\" is required but not provided. The value can be inferred from the filename alone.\n\nFrom the directory structure, it seems like there are three HDF5 files: meta_data.csv, name_mapping.csv, survival_info.h5, and volume_1_slice_x.h5 (which might contain BIDS metadata).\n\nI need to ask for missing information if needed\u2014never assume. The user provided a directory structure but didn't provide any details about the content of these CSV files or the specific contents of meta_data.csv etc.\n\nSo I should analyze only what's given and request more details if insufficient.\n</think>\nOkay, let me think about how BIDS datasets are structured. A typical BIDS dataset is typically organized with a root directory structure that includes subdirectories for subjects (like sub-ids) but here the files provided don't have standard BIDS entities like participants.tsv or events.tsv files.\n\nBut I missing information\u2014let's list any relevant metadata and ask for more details if needed.\nDo not guess anything. The user has provided a dataset directory structure, so I need to build a correct JSON file that is compliant with BIDS standards without making assumptions.\n\nFirst, let's look at the required fields from BIDS specification:\n\nThe dataset_description.json requires specific fields based on presence of files and inferred compliance. Let me analyze each file in the directory structure provided by the user.\n\nDataset Directory Structure:\ncontent/\n    data/ (or subdirectories)\n\nI need"
+}