Datasets:
Update README
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,234 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- en
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
pretty_name: BeautyCommerceOS
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 10 |
+
- tabular-classification
|
| 11 |
+
- tabular-regression
|
| 12 |
+
- time-series-forecasting
|
| 13 |
+
- question-answering
|
| 14 |
+
- text-generation
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
tags:
|
| 17 |
+
- synthetic-data
|
| 18 |
+
- ai-agents
|
| 19 |
+
- llm-evaluation
|
| 20 |
+
- autonomous-agents
|
| 21 |
+
- tool-use
|
| 22 |
+
- causal-reasoning
|
| 23 |
+
- decision-intelligence
|
| 24 |
+
- analytics-engineering
|
| 25 |
+
- data-engineering
|
| 26 |
+
- business-intelligence
|
| 27 |
+
- data-warehouse
|
| 28 |
+
- enterprise-ai
|
| 29 |
+
- ecommerce
|
| 30 |
+
- attribution-modeling
|
| 31 |
+
- experimentation
|
| 32 |
+
- supply-chain
|
| 33 |
+
- finance
|
| 34 |
+
- parquet
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 37 |
+
- 1M<n<10M
|
| 38 |
---
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
# π BeautyCommerceOS
|
| 41 |
+
## Autonomous Analytics & Enterprise Reasoning Benchmark
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
BeautyCommerceOS is a large-scale synthetic enterprise data warehouse designed to benchmark **autonomous AI agents and analytics systems operating in realistic business environments**.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
It simulates the full lifecycle of a modern global beauty ecommerce company β from user behavior to financial reconciliation β including the ambiguity, inconsistency, and cross-functional complexity found in real enterprises.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
---
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
# π§ Why this dataset exists
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Most datasets teach *analysis on clean tables*.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
BeautyCommerceOS teaches something harder:
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
> **Cross-domain reasoning across a messy, real-world enterprise.**
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
It is designed to evaluate whether AI systems can reason across:
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
- conflicting KPIs across departments
|
| 60 |
+
- delayed revenue recognition
|
| 61 |
+
- attribution uncertainty across marketing channels
|
| 62 |
+
- inventory and supply chain mismatches
|
| 63 |
+
- finance vs marketing reporting divergence
|
| 64 |
+
- experimentation interference effects
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
This makes it suitable for evaluating **LLM agents, autonomous analysts, and decision intelligence systems**.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
---
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
# ποΈ Dataset Structure
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
The dataset follows a modern **medallion warehouse architecture**:
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
## π€ Bronze Layer (Raw Behavioral Data)
|
| 75 |
+
- sessions
|
| 76 |
+
- clickstream events
|
| 77 |
+
- anonymous users
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
## βͺ Silver Layer (Conformed Dimensions)
|
| 80 |
+
- products
|
| 81 |
+
- SKUs
|
| 82 |
+
- brands
|
| 83 |
+
- suppliers
|
| 84 |
+
- warehouses
|
| 85 |
+
- identity mapping
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
## π‘ Gold Layer (Business & Financial Truth)
|
| 88 |
+
- orders
|
| 89 |
+
- order_items
|
| 90 |
+
- payments
|
| 91 |
+
- refunds
|
| 92 |
+
- campaigns
|
| 93 |
+
- attribution
|
| 94 |
+
- inventory
|
| 95 |
+
- shipments
|
| 96 |
+
- invoices
|
| 97 |
+
- profit & loss (P&L)
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
---
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
# π Key Capabilities
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
BeautyCommerceOS supports evaluation of:
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
## π§ AI Agent Reasoning
|
| 106 |
+
- multi-step business question answering
|
| 107 |
+
- cross-table joins across domains
|
| 108 |
+
- causal inference under noisy signals
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
## π Marketing Intelligence
|
| 111 |
+
- attribution modeling
|
| 112 |
+
- ROAS vs profit divergence
|
| 113 |
+
- influencer impact analysis
|
| 114 |
+
- channel cannibalization effects
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
## π Supply Chain Analytics
|
| 117 |
+
- stockout impact analysis
|
| 118 |
+
- fulfillment delay tracking
|
| 119 |
+
- warehouse performance comparison
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
## π° Financial Reconciliation
|
| 122 |
+
- revenue recognition delays
|
| 123 |
+
- finance vs marketing mismatches
|
| 124 |
+
- margin decomposition
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
## π§ͺ Experimentation Analysis
|
| 127 |
+
- A/B test evaluation
|
| 128 |
+
- treatment contamination
|
| 129 |
+
- causal uplift estimation
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
---
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
# β οΈ Realism & Complexity
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
Unlike traditional synthetic datasets, BeautyCommerceOS intentionally includes:
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
- inconsistent attribution signals
|
| 138 |
+
- delayed financial reconciliation
|
| 139 |
+
- missing or noisy event data
|
| 140 |
+
- KPI definition conflicts across teams
|
| 141 |
+
- operational distortions across systems
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
These are included to reflect real enterprise environments and enable robust evaluation of reasoning systems.
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
---
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
# π Example Evaluation Tasks
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
BeautyCommerceOS can be used to evaluate systems on questions such as:
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
### π Business Performance
|
| 152 |
+
- Why did revenue increase while profit declined?
|
| 153 |
+
- Which channels generate the lowest long-term customer value?
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
### π§ Attribution & Marketing
|
| 156 |
+
- Which attribution model best explains observed revenue?
|
| 157 |
+
- Are influencer campaigns profitable after refunds and returns?
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
### π Operations
|
| 160 |
+
- Which warehouses contribute most to fulfillment delays?
|
| 161 |
+
- How do stockouts impact downstream revenue loss?
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
### π° Finance
|
| 164 |
+
- Why do finance and marketing report different revenue figures?
|
| 165 |
+
- What is the true margin after operational adjustments?
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
### π€ AI Agent Benchmarking
|
| 168 |
+
- Can an autonomous agent reconcile conflicting KPIs across systems?
|
| 169 |
+
- Can it identify root causes across marketing, finance, and logistics?
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
---
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
# π Intended Use
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
This dataset is designed for:
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
- autonomous agent evaluation
|
| 178 |
+
- LLM reasoning benchmarks
|
| 179 |
+
- analytics engineering practice
|
| 180 |
+
- causal inference research
|
| 181 |
+
- BI system testing
|
| 182 |
+
- data warehouse simulation
|
| 183 |
+
- decision intelligence systems
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
+
---
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
# π« Not Intended For
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
- real-world financial forecasting
|
| 190 |
+
- production decision-making
|
| 191 |
+
- regulatory reporting
|
| 192 |
+
- personal or sensitive data usage
|
| 193 |
+
|
| 194 |
+
---
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
# π Synthetic Data Statement
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
All data in this repository is fully synthetic and generated programmatically.
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
No real users, transactions, or personally identifiable information are included.
|
| 201 |
+
|
| 202 |
+
---
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
# π¦ Format
|
| 205 |
+
|
| 206 |
+
- Columnar storage: Parquet
|
| 207 |
+
- Architecture: Medallion (Bronze / Silver / Gold)
|
| 208 |
+
- Structure: Partitioned data warehouse
|
| 209 |
+
- Size: < 10 GB total
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
---
|
| 212 |
+
|
| 213 |
+
# π License
|
| 214 |
+
|
| 215 |
+
Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
|
| 216 |
+
|
| 217 |
+
You are free to:
|
| 218 |
+
- use
|
| 219 |
+
- modify
|
| 220 |
+
- redistribute
|
| 221 |
+
- build upon
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
with attribution.
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
---
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
# π Vision
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
BeautyCommerceOS bridges the gap between:
|
| 230 |
+
|
| 231 |
+
- clean academic datasets
|
| 232 |
+
- and real-world enterprise complexity
|
| 233 |
+
|
| 234 |
+
It is designed to test whether modern AI systems can move beyond simple data analysis into **true enterprise-level reasoning under ambiguity**.
|