The little children trailing round behind us rush forward in their excitement, herding me into their makeshift schoolroom.

One Syrian boy happily shows a model he has made out of cardboard - a neat house, complete with a shiny red roof, bright blue walls and tiny windows that swing open.
It is a bitter sweet achievement.
He has designed his dream house from memory of a time before, for there are no windows to open here.
We are in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley, and the schoolroom in this camp, like all the 40 or so other buildings, is made of wooden frames on concrete floors, covered in plastic sheeting.
Much of it is decorated with incongruous advertising pictures, black-and-white shots of men in sunglasses and designer stubble.
UK Prime Minister David Cameron wants to take refugees directly from camps like this in the Middle East, rather than absorb the people who have already made the journey to Hungary, Greece or Italy.
The logic is that it will stop people making the perilous voyage across the Mediterranean.
It makes a lot of sense. But it may already be too little, and far too late. Taking 4,000 more people each year until 2020 will hardly dent the problem.
The border with Syria is only a few miles across the hill rising above the camp.
The people here can still hear the war they fled, as President Bashar al-Assad's bombs land on a besieged town.
Life is definitely safer this side of the border. But it is not comfortable.
There are rats, the drinking water is dirty, and while it is now stifling under the September Sun, in winter the snow is 3ft (1m) high and they freeze.
More importantly, life is getting worse and the pressure to leave Lebanon is growing all the time.
One man, Mzead al-Ali, tells me he is on the brink of following those who have made the perilous exodus, leaving his wife and four children, including two seven-month-old twins, behind in the camp, so he can send them money.
His brother left three days ago for Turkey. They haven't heard from him since he went, and don't know if he is safe.
His mother wants to talk about it but has to keep pressing her hands flat against her face, to stop the tears.
This is not, according to the government here, a refugee camp  but a temporary settlement, and there are thousands like it.
Lebanon is a country of four million people, and it now hosts well over a million refugees from its war-riven bigger neighbour.
A third live in camps like this, but life is difficult also for others who have more conventional accommodation.
The burden on Lebanon is nearly unbearable, as a government minister told me, and there are rising tensions.
The refugees' presence puts pressure on the already dubious efficiency of water and electricity, schooling and health care.
The charities are running out of money, and food aid has been slashed and slashed again. It is due to be cut again soon.
Refugees can't get work permits so can't earn money for the papers they need to renew every year - the $200 (Â£130) is out of sight for most of them.
Almost unbelievably, they have to pay rent for their camps, and they are not allowed to expand them, even though the population is steadily growing.
The borders are closed, so they can't go back and relatives can't join them.
The schoolroom is funded with aid from Britain.
It is part of the UK government's case that while it make take fewer refugees than other countries, it spends far more in helping people in the Middle East.
But it is noticeable that the schoolroom is decorated with crayon drawings in black, yellow and red - the German flag.
"Next time you come, we have a British flag," says Mr al-Ali, slightly embarrassed.
He says he wants German Chancellor Angela Merkel to send a big ship to take them all to Europe.
There is anger here that the rich Gulf States and Saudi Arabia have done next to nothing to help settle refugees and seem oblivious to the fact that some might think it their responsibility before Europe's.
For this crisis raises some interesting questions about leadership.
Germany's latest intervention is fascinating, reflecting a change in attitude that means it is more confident of making foreign policy gestures intended to show leadership in Europe, and which demonstrate a wish to change the world through instruments other than war.
There is also a new impatience with other EU members, and a willingness to lead through example rather than wait for agreement.
Germany, where for a long time foreign workers have been made to feel unloved, wants to show itself as open to the world, a successful and dynamic economy that can absorb, indeed needs, a new workforce.
But it may have unintended consequences.
Earlier this week, Lebanon's morning newspaper, the Daily Star, carried an advert by the Danish government, warning it had toughened up its asylum rules and cut benefits to migrants.
The Danes will not be the only ones who worry about the downside of German generosity.
People I met in Lebanon say those who would like to leave Iraq and Afghanistan have heard a message - now is the time to go to Europe, before there is another change of mood and the drawbridge goes up again.
So it is little wonder people in non-governmental organisations (NGOs) feel Mr Cameron may be onto something - it makes sense processing people here, rather than luring them into a dangerous journey.
But while the British policy was announced last week and fleshed out in the Commons on Monday, no-one in Lebanon has heard anything officially.
The generous feel it will take a while, the cynical that it is all about the headlines.
Wednesday's announcement on migrant quotas was focused solely on dealing with the crisis within Europe, but there has not even been a whisper of a coordinated European approach using camps in the Middle East, which is what would seem to make the most sense.
It is the death of one toddler on a Turkish shore and the sight of thousands of people dragging themselves across Europe that has focused the minds of politicians on this crisis on our continent.
There is  a clear need, somehow, to absorb - or, some might argue, return - these people.
But the far greater crisis is elsewhere, and indeed is also in the future.
Mass migration is not just the by-product of one horrible war, or even several conflicts and vile regimes but, in part, the result of the growing aspirations, understanding and opportunity that globalisation brings.
Biafra did not send thousands of the dispossessed into Europe.
On 30 May 1967, the head of the Eastern Region of Nigeria, Col Emeka Ojukwu, unilaterally declared the independent Republic of Biafra.
The Biafran forces were pushed back after initial military gains.
More than two years later, after one million civilians had died in fighting and from famine, Biafra was reabsorbed into Nigeria.
Thirty years ago, the Ethiopian famine produced Live Aid - it meant thousands of people packing into a concert venue in central London for a day, not thousands of the displaced crowding on to trains and lorries for years.
When the cities and farmlands of millions people disappear under the waves, it will not be so.
When nations fight wars over precious water, populations will march, not in protest, but to happier lands.
It is genuinely hard for politicians in democracies to think beyond four-year cycles, and the next day's headlines.
But perhaps it is time they made a start.
You can listen to our programme from Beirut here.


There is "no obvious" link between tough laws and levels of illegal drug use, a government report has found.

Liberal Democrat Home Office minister Norman Baker said the report, comparing the UK with other countries, should end "mindless rhetoric" on drugs policy.
He accused the Conservatives of "suppressing" the findings for months.
Prime Minister David Cameron said the research did not offer "specific conclusions" and said he did not "believe in" decriminalising drugs.
Drugs policy was debated in the House of Commons earlier, with Green MP Caroline Lucas urging the government to review "failing" drugs laws.
Under current laws, offenders can be jailed for up to seven years for possessing Class A drugs, and can be jailed for life for producing or supplying drugs.
The Home Office report compared the UK's approach to drug misuse with that of 13 other countries.
9 have sanctioned "drug consumption rooms", including Canada, Denmark and Switzerland
8 are trialling the treatment of addicts with pure heroin rather than methadone, including Switzerland, the Netherlands and the UK
4 have special "drug courts", where people pleading guilty to drug offences can opt for treatment rather than prison, including the US
1 has set up "dissuasion commissions" - Portugal
After examining a range of approaches, from zero-tolerance to decriminalisation, it concluded drug use was influenced by factors "more complex and nuanced than legislation and enforcement alone".
But it found there had been a "considerable" improvement in the health of drug users in Portugal since the country made drug possession a health issue rather than a criminal one in 2001.
The Home Office said these outcomes could not be attributed to decriminalisation alone.
But Mr Baker believes treating drug use as a health matter would be more effective, "rather than presuming locking people up is the answer".
Alex, a recovering heroin and crack addict from London
The majority of my family either suffer from addiction or have died as a consequence of it. I have buried two friends this year.
Addiction is a progressive illness. I started smoking cannabis when I was 18 or 19 at university.
I was abstinent in the army, but used alcohol in cross-addiction for about six years. I served in Iraq and was blown up in Basra. Post-Iraq, I worked in contract security and would use when I got back to the UK.
I'm 38. I got clean at 30 and go to 12-step fellowship meetings nearly every day.
I don't believe for one moment that the current laws deter any addict from using, to assume they do makes the assumption that addicts have control and choice.
The views of the Home Office are out of touch and most probably based in ignorance of what addiction is. No-one I know chose to become an addict.
The fact the Home Office is responsible for drug policy, including treatment, is alarming and probably why the UK is blighted with addiction.
Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg accused the Conservatives of a "totally misplaced, outdated, backward-looking view".
While Mr Baker said: "We've had what I would call mindless rhetoric over the last 40 years which has tended to say there is only one solution and anyone who offers any alternative must by definition be 'soft on drugs'."
He said the Conservatives had suppressed publication of the report because of the "inconvenient truths" it contained.
But Tory MP Michael Ellis, a member of the Home Affairs Committee, said the Lib Dems had "hijacked" it for political gain.
"Their frankly pro-drugs policy is dangerous and irresponsible," he added.
Mr Cameron said: "Under this government drug use is falling and I think that's because we have followed an evidence-based approach.
"We have been focusing on education and prevention and treatment - that is the right approach to take."
He said the report was "interesting", but added: "It doesn't draw specific conclusions.
"I don't think anyone can read that report and say it definitely justifies this approach or that approach."
Danny Shaw, BBC home affairs correspondent
The divisions within the coalition could not be more sharply exposed.
The official Home Office position is that its drug strategy is working.
Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat minister with responsibility for drugs, says "radical" change is needed.
Mr Baker's claims have been fuelled by his department's own report, which finds no link between how tough a country is on drugs and how many people use them.
It's an important finding, but the study also makes clear that drug policy is highly complex - approaches which may work abroad can't necessarily be implanted into the UK.
The report said it would be "inappropriate" to compare the success of drug policies in different countries because data collection and many other factors differ between each one.
But it said "some observations can be made" and it was "not clear" decriminalisation has an impact on levels of drug use.
"Looking across different countries, there is no apparent correlation between the 'toughness' of a country's approach and the prevalence of adult drug use," it stated.
Nick Barton, of charity Action on Addiction, said: "Today's report once again highlights the need for addiction to be treated as a health condition, rather than a criminal justice one."
He said jailing drug users was "rarely a solution".
Danny Kushlick, the founder of the group Transform, which has been campaigning for the legal regulation of drugs in the UK for almost 20 years, said the report was an important step.
"For the first time in over 40 years the Home Office has admitted that enforcing tough drug laws doesn't necessarily reduce levels of drug use," he said.
Matthew Price, Europe correspondent, BBC News
Back in the 1990s Portugal was struggling with a heroin epidemic of almost epic proportions. One person in every 100 was a heroin addict.
Not everyone agreed with the approach that was adopted to try and end the problem. In fact, many on the right wing of politics were appalled when prosecutions for people using drugs were ended.
They didn't like the idea that addiction would be treated as a health issue, rather than a criminal one, that addicts would be given treatment and healthcare to help them overcome their addiction. Those voices have been silenced now.
Fifteen years later, and the number of people hooked on heroin has been halved, and there have been good results in terms of Aids infection, hepatitis infection and the like.
Back in the 1990s "we feared that Portugal could turn into a paradise for drug users", says Dr Jaoa Goulao, Portugal's national co-ordinator on drugs and drug addiction.
Thanks to the policy, that didn't happen, he says.
A separate Home Office report has called for a blanket ban on all brain-altering drugs in a bid to tackle legal highs.
Currently, when a legal high is made illegal, manufacturers are avoiding the law by tweaking the chemical compound and creating a new substance.
The government will consider legislation introduced in Ireland four years ago that bans the sale of all "psychoactive" substances but exempts some, such as alcohol and tobacco.


The closure of a medical centre for commercial pilots at Gatwick Airport has been branded "corporate vandalism".

The Civil Aviation Authority's (CAA) centre was opened after the 1972 Staines plane crash was partly blamed on a pilot's heart condition.
Dr Michael Joy, the first consultant at the centre, said the closure was not in the interest of aviation safety.
The CAA said other independently run centres were available to pilots, including in the Gatwick area.
Dr Joy said: "I think this is corporate vandalism.
"The pool of expertise built up over a generation is going to be dispersed and that cannot be in the interest of aviation safety, and it cannot be in the interest of the pilots."
A CAA spokesman said: "It was felt that the CAA should not be both a service provider and regulator of medical services.
"All requirements relating to pilot and air traffic controllers' medical examinations and fitness standards are set at a European-wide level and these will remain unchanged regardless of who provides medical services."
In 1972 a British European Airways Flight BE548 crashed in a field shortly after takeoff, killing all 118 people on board - at the time one of the UK's worst air disasters.
One of the underlying causes of the crash was the captain's health, a public inquiry found.
Capt Stanley Key had a heart condition which had lead to a "lack of concentration and impaired judgement", the official report said.
The crash led to the setting up of what is now known as the CAA's Aeromedical Centre.
Mervyn Granshaw, a former pilot from Surrey said; "The whole process of aero-medicine has evolved over the 30 years that it's been a centre of excellence."
The centre is due to close on 29 February.


Fionnuala McCormack is likely to battle for the women's win at Sunday's Great Ireland Run with another ex-European cross country Champion Gemma Steel.

The duo will lead their respective Ireland and England line-ups which fight it out for the Sean Kyle Cup in the team competition in Dublin.
McCormack's fellow Irish Olympian Kerry O'Flaherty will also be in action.
Irish duo Mick Clohisey and Mark Christie will hope to ward off the English challenge in the men's event.
McCormack and O'Flaherty are joined in the Irish women's team by Laura O'Shaughnessy and Catherine Whoriskey and Claire McCarthy while Steel's England team-mates include 2016 Great Bristol Half Marathon winner Jenny Spink.
Over 8,000 runners will race in the meeting which includes a Great Ireland 5K event in addition to the two main 10K races, which will double as the Irish National Championships for the distance.
Last year Great Ireland Run event director, former Irish international athlete Gareth Turnbull came up with the idea of incorporating a team match into the event to pay tribute to the renowned coach Kyle, who formed a remarkable partnership with his wife, the three-time Olympian Maeve Kyle at the Ballymena & Antrim club.
The team component saw an Ireland line-up which included McCormack, lifting the inaugural Sean Kyle Cup, as they defeated a Commonwealth select.
The mixing of the sport's grassroots and elite athletes is something that would have delighted Ballymena athletics doyen Kyle, who died after a long illness in November 2015.
Clohisey represented Ireland at the marathon in last year's Olympics but Christie's personal best for the distance of 29 minutes and 20 seconds suggests he could be the leading men's home hopeful, although his team-mate Kevin Dooney has clocked 29:10.13 for 10,000m on the track.
Sergiu Ciobanu, in some eyes a controversial omission from last year's Irish Olympic marathon team, is also down to race in the Phoenix Park.
This year's English Cross County silver medallist Alex Teuten is in an England squad which also includes sub-30 minutes 10K men Graham Rush, John Beattie and Daniel Cliffe.
Sunday's event will again honour the memory of late Ballymena & Antrim athletics club great Sean Kyle.


Carlisle United midfielder Gary Dicker says it has been "devastating" to see the impact of floods in Cumbria caused by Storm Desmond.

More than 2,500 homes across the region remain without power, with eight rescue centres open to the public.
Following Carlisle's 5-0 FA Cup win at Welling on Sunday, players offered to help anyone affected by the flooding when they finish training on Tuesday.
"It's the least we can do," Dicker told BBC Radio Cumbria.
"There were people after the game when we went over to clap the fans in the stands who've been affected - there was one or two who said their houses were flooded and they still made it to the game.
"It hit home on the way back, all of the foreign lads said they've never seen anything like it.
"To be so close to it and see how it's affected so many people is devastating."


An estranged father and son are going head to head at the district council elections in Nottinghamshire.

Tom Hollis is standing as a Liberal Democrat against his father Michael who is standing for Labour in Ashfield District Council's elections on 7 May.
Tom said he has not seen his father, who refused to speak to the BBC, since he was a teenager.
Also standing in the Ashfields ward are Conservative John Baker and Independent Eric Hetherington.
Tom, who is also Nottinghamshire County Councillor, said he was "disappointed and hurt" by his father's decision to stand against him.
"I haven't seen my dad since I was a teenager," he said. "It's fair to say he didn't agree with the life choices I've made."
Michael Hollis declined to comment but a Labour Party spokesman said they are "standing excellent candidates in every ward".
In 2011, Tom became the youngest county councillor in England when he was elected aged 18.
At the time, his father said the whole family had been convinced to switch allegiance from Labour to Liberal Democrat.
Tom's partner Jason Zadrozny recently stood down as the Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate for Ashfield when he was accused child sex offences dating back a decade.
Mr Zadrozny, who denies the allegations, is now standing as an Independent in the district council elections in the Larwood ward.
He faces Linford Gibbons for Labour, Austin Heron for UKIP and Conservative Paul Sheridan.
In a further twist, Mr Zadrozny's Liberal Democrat replacement in the district elections, Philip Smith, is standing against Tom Hollis's mother Helen, who represents Labour.
They are the only candidates contesting The Dales ward on Ashfield District Council.


A three-month-old kitten has been rescued by firefighters after becoming trapped 50ft up a wall at Pembroke Castle.

The black and white male has been nicknamed Henry, after King Henry VII who was born at the castle in Pembrokeshire.
The RSPCA said it was a horrible ordeal for Henry, who was very frightened.
He was given antibiotics and pain relief by a vet, and is recovering well.
RSPCA animal collection officer Ellie West said: "It was just by chance someone saw the kitten struggling on the wall. The poor little thing was so frightened. We don't know how he got there.
"He is very sore and bruised and he has torn a bit of his skin on his thigh which should heal. But he is doing really well and is now recovering from his ordeal in our care.
"He's eaten well overnight which is good as he's actually a little skinny under all that fur."
It is believed Henry is a stray cat, but the RSPCA has appealed for information in case he has an owner.


The first black or Asian prime minister will be a Conservative, David Cameron has said, in a speech on opportunities for ethnic minority Britons.

The prime minister told in audience in south London he looked forward to the day, as he outlined plans to increase the number of ethnic minority Tory MPs.
Mr Cameron also pledged to boost minority ethnic jobs, university places and police recruits by 2020.
Of 306 Conservative MPs elected in 2010, 11 were black or Asian.
Labour had 16 ethnic minority MPs elected in 2010, while the Lib Dems had none.
In that election, the Conservative Party only won 16% of the ethnic minority vote, which has historically favoured Labour. In 2015, it is fielding 56 candidates from black and Asian communities. Labour is fielding 52 ethnic minority candidates.
Setting out his vision to increase the number of black and Asian students, apprentices, entrepreneurs and police and armed forces personnel, Mr Cameron said he was also setting ambitions for the Conservatives.
"In the last Parliament, we increased our number of black and Asian MPs from two, to 11. Now that's not enough, but it's good progress. At this election, there is one party fielding more black and ethnic minority candidates than any other and I'm proud to say, that it's us - the Conservatives."
He said in 18% of "retirement seats", where a Conservative MP was standing down and which "we have a very good chance of keeping", the party was standing a candidate from an ethnic minority. By 2020 - he said he wanted that to reach 20% of retirement seats.
"And why not? We are the first party to have a female prime minister, we were the party of the first Jewish prime minister and I know one day, we are going to be the party of the first black or Asian prime minister," he said.
Main pledges
Policy guide: Where the parties stand
Pressed on whether he thought Culture Secretary Sajid Javid was in the running to succeed him as prime minister in questions after the speech, he said: "It won't be for me to choose, but the ambition is there and I hope you can sense from me, the excitement is there."
Amid reports that London Mayor Boris Johnson is being lined up for a "rapid coronation" as Conservative leader if the party fails to win an outright majority, Mr Cameron said he was focused on the next 12 days of the election campaign and would leave speculation up to the media.
In his speech at the Fairfield Halls, Croydon, Mr Cameron said he wanted Britain to be an "opportunity country" where people from all backgrounds could "make the most of your talents".
He said he wanted to see "ambitious but realistic" targets for black and Asian people - pledging 20% increases by 2020 in the number of jobs, apprenticeships, university places, start-up business loans and police officer recruits from ethnic minorities. In the Armed Forces he pledged an increase of at least 10% "on the way to 20%".
Labour Leader Ed Miliband launched his party's black, Asian and ethnic minority manifesto earlier this month, alongside shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan - suggesting quotas could be used to increase the number of non-white and working class people in top jobs, including senior civil servants and the judiciary.
They accuse the coalition of overseeing a big rise in the number of young black and Asian people in long-term unemployment.


Everton have re-signed Barcelona forward Gerard Deulofeu on a permanent basis after agreeing a £4.3m deal for the one-cap Spain international.

Deulofeu had a successful loan season at Everton in 2013-14 but spent much of the last campaign on the sidelines during a spell at Sevilla.
The 21-year-old has signed a three-year deal and will move on 1 July.
Everton boss Roberto Martinez believes Deulofeu can still develop into one of the game's outstanding young talents.
He told Everton's website: "We are getting an even more mature player now than he was a couple of seasons ago and a player who considers Everton as home.
"This is why we are incredibly excited to have him back here on a permanent basis and to encourage him to grow, develop and mature his enormous talent."
Martinez forged a close relationship with the player during their season together and Deulofeu believes his countryman can revive his career.
He has turned down other more lucrative offers to return to Merseyside.
Personal terms have been agreed and it is believed Barcelona will insert a buy-back option into the deal for some future point should he develop as they once hoped.
Deulofeu will become Everton's second signing of the summer after England midfield man Tom Cleverley joined on a free transfer from Manchester United following a successful loan spell at Aston Villa.
Martinez said he was "really pleased" to complete the signings early in the transfer window.
He added: "It was always our intention to work extremely hard behind the scenes to get some really good business done early on during the transfer window."


The family of a teenager who lost his arms and legs from meningitis were shocked when told he had to prove he still needed a disability payment.

Edward Bright, from Ripley, Derbyshire, lost his limbs when he was seven and needs help with much of his life.
When he turned 16 and reapplied for a benefit he was told he had to attend a meeting to be assessed.
The Department for Work and Pensions has now said a face-to-face meeting is not necessary.
Edward's family claimed disability living allowance (DLA) on his behalf to help towards the added cost of life as a quad-amputee but when he turned 16 he had to reapply for a personal independence payment (PIP).
The family were horrified to receive a letter calling him to a meeting with an assessor in Derby and threatening to withdraw the money if he did not attend.
His dad Steve said: "He has already been through all the assessments. Nothing has changed [in his situation] in the last seven years; nothing will change, so being called in to interviews every year is pointless.
"People with disabilities have enough appointments anyway. You should reach a level when it's flagged up on the system: no more interviews needed."
Since the family's case featured in the Daily Mirror, the Department of Work and Pensions has admitted the assessment is unnecessary.
"All DLA claimants are invited to apply for the working-age benefit Personal Independence Payment when they turn 16. In this instance a paper-based assessment has been completed and there is no need for a face-to-face assessment.
"We've tried to call the Brights numerous times to make clear there's no need to attend a meeting on Monday. A letter has been sent through the post."


A man whose body was found on a path in Bridgefoot near Dundee has been identified, police have confirmed.

The 49-year-old was discovered close to Rosemill Road at about 08:00 on Tuesday.
Officers had issued a description of the man following the discovery in an attempt to identify him.
Police said there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding the man's death and a report had been sent to the procurator fiscal.


Two more women have come forward to accuse Donald Trump of sexual assault, in the latest such allegations against the embattled Republican nominee.

Former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos said the businessman forced himself on her at a Los Angeles hotel and began "thrusting his genitals".
Kristin Anderson told the Washington Post he reached up her skirt and groped her in a New York club in the 1990s.
The Republican nominee branded the allegations as "lies and smears".
Ms Anderson, now 46, said the property mogul touched her through her underwear at a Manhattan nightspot when she was a waitress trying to make it as a model.
She said she was "very grossed out and weirded out".
Ms Anderson said she turned round to find a man sitting on a red velvet couch whom she recognised instantly as the celebrity property mogul.
"He was so distinctive looking," she told the Washington Post, "with the hair and the eyebrows. I mean, nobody else has those eyebrows."
She added: "It wasn't a sexual come-on. I don't know why he did it. It was like just to prove that he could do it, and nothing would happen.
"There was zero conversation. We didn't even really look at each other. It was very random, very nonchalant on his part."
The newspaper said it had approached Ms Anderson after learning of her story through a third party, and she had spent several days deciding whether to go public.
Mr Trump's spokeswoman, Hope Hicks, said in a statement emailed to the Washington Post: "Mr Trump strongly denies this phony allegation by someone looking to get some free publicity. It is totally ridiculous."
Meanwhile, Summer Zervos, a former contestant on season five of The Apprentice in 2006, said she was sexually assaulted by Mr Trump after she was invited by him to discuss job opportunities.
Ms Zervos, 41, told an emotional news conference in Los Angeles that she met him in 2007 in a bungalow at the Beverly Hills Hotel, where the businessman greeted her by kissing her on the mouth.
She said he asked her to sit next to him on a sofa where he "grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again very aggressively and placed his hand on my breast".
Ms Zervos fought back tears as she said Mr Trump attempted to lead her into the bedroom and "began thrusting his genitals", even as she fended off his advances.
She said Mr Trump then began talking to her as if she were a candidate for a job interview.
Ms Zervos, who described herself as a Republican, said she was subsequently offered a low-paid job at a Trump-owned golf course.
She was flanked during the press conference by well-known lawyer Gloria Allred, who has previously represented alleged sexual assault victims of entertainer Bill Cosby.
At the time of the alleged assault, Mr Trump was recently married to his third and current wife, Melania Trump.
His campaign said he "vaguely remembers" Ms Zervos, but insisted the meeting at the hotel never happened.
And during a rally in North Carolina on Friday, the Republican candidate said the several accusations were "sick" and fabricated.
"I don't know who these people are. I look on television, I think it's a disgusting thing and it's being pushed, they have no witnesses, there's nobody around.
"Some are doing it for probably a little fame, they get some free fame. It's a total set-up."
Who is ahead in the polls?
48%
Hillary Clinton
44%
Donald Trump
Last updated November 8, 2016
Ms Zervos said she was spurred to come forward after Mr Trump denied during last Sunday's presidential debate ever having committed sexual assault.
He rebutted the suggestion on national television as he was asked about a leaked recording from 2005 in which he is heard bragging that he can force himself on women because he is a star.
Meanwhile, his campaign presented a British man who disputed the account of one of the accusers, Jessica Leeds.
Ms Leeds, now 74, said that when she was 38 Mr Trump groped her on a flight to New York, acting "like an octopus".
The New York Post reported that Anthony Gilberthorpe contacted Mr Trump's campaign to counter the claim. In an interview to the paper he said: "I was there, I was in a position to know that what she said was wrong, wrong, wrong."
Mr Gilberthorpe made headlines in 2014 when he alleged that he had provided underage boys to British politicians for sex parties.
Referring to Ms Leeds in the rally in North Carolina, Mr Trump said: "Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you."
Polls suggest Mr Trump is losing ground in some of the key battleground states against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, with just 24 days until the election.


Changes at the top of Tata Steel Europe raise doubts about the "long-term investment" of the company, according the steelworkers union, Community.

Chief executive Karl Koehler is standing down and his replacement will not have a position on the main Tata board in Mumbai, unlike Mr Koehler.
Tata is making 1,050 people redundant, including 750 at its Port Talbot site.
Community organiser Rob Edwards said he was surprised by Mr Koehler's departure and what it meant for the future.
"I think it compounds the recent news about the redundancies. You start to ask questions about long-term investments," said Mr Edwards.
"There is an element of doubt, we walk a path of uncertainty," he told BBC Radio Wales's Wales at Work programme.
He added that he wasn't concerned about the short-term commitments made by the company as it tries to save Â£300m as part of its current survival plan.
He said the union was worried that the move weakened the voice of the European operation when it came to decisions being made by the board in future.
Workers from Tata marched through Brussels with Mr Koehler and steelworkers from across Europe demanding that the EU take action on the price of Chinese imports.
New chief executive of Tata Steel Europe, Hans Fischer, takes over on 1 March.
Koushik Chatterjee, the group executive director for finance and corporate affairs, will add responsibility for Europe to his role on the Tata Steel board in Mumbai.


A man has been charged with murder more than two years after an assault in which the victim later died.

Joseph Leach, 32, suffered serious injuries following an incident in Woodland Terrace in Washington, near Sunderland, in December 2013.
He underwent surgery at Newcastle's Royal Victoria Infirmary after the attack, but died on 2 April last year.
Karl Pascoe, 31, from Washington, is due in court on 15 April charged with his murder, Northumbria Police said.


Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action (NICVA) chief executive Seamus McAleavey has warned hundreds of job losses are likely as a result of cuts in the sector.

Mr McAleavey said the scale of the job losses was unprecedented.
He is seeking an emergency meeting with Northern Ireland's first minister and deputy first minister to address the issue.
Groups in the environment, the arts and training are affected by the cuts.
"Skilled staff will be lost from our sector and the impact will be felt right across Northern Ireland with a loss of local walking routes, arts events and childcare facilities," Mr McAleavey said.
"Voluntary and community organisations provide highly specialised services in areas where government provision doesn't meet the needs of local people and often work with harder to reach client groups.
"It is obvious that the most vulnerable people will be harder hit with programmes focusing on training and support to help people get jobs, develop crucial early learning skills in children and rehabilitation being cut."
Among the worst hit is the Early Years organisation which promotes childcare.
It has lost a £2m grant from the Department of Education and said more than 170 jobs are under threat.
NICVA has been collecting data on how it believes the cuts will hit various organisations and assessing the impact on their funding streams, jobs and members of the community.
Siobhán Fitzpatrick, chief executive of Early Years, said it was a "worrying time for parents and staff in early years settings".
"We fully appreciate the difficult economic decisions that have to be made but early years is not the right area to target," she said.
"The impact of this on 153 communities, 2,500 children and 177 jobs across Northern Ireland will be devastating in the short and long term."
Marie Cavanagh of Gingerbread, which provides free advice, training, and practical support for single parents, said it lost five of its staff this week through redundancy, with another position also expected to go.
She said it represented a third of their workforce, and as well as the human cost in terms of jobs, it meant "lone parents are the losers".
Ms Cavanagh said the organisation had supported more than 1,300 lone parents to train and undertake essential workplace activities, over the past 25 years.
She said Gingerbread had applied for around £195,000 from the European Social Fund for 2015/2016 as part of a three-year application, but had received nothing.
It had been running a programme, Marks & Start, which combined three days of pre-employment training with a two-week work experience placement with Marks & Spencer.
Gingerbread had hoped to widen the scope of the programme this year.
"Over 50% of those who did the Marks & Start programme got some form of employability, we hoped to widen it out to 300 lone parents," she added.
"Three hundred lone parents have lost the opportunity to train and experience employment which would have benefited their families and children and could have led to employment."
Karen Sweeney, director of the Women's Support Network, said the cuts would have "long-lasting effects in terms of supporting vulnerable families, those with mental health issues, tackling unemployment, reducing child poverty and the provision of accessible childcare".
Ulster Unionist assembly member Robin Swann said: "I am concerned that cuts in funding for training in the community sector will affect the most vulnerable in our society who have no other avenues to fund their support programmes."
Mr Swann, who is chairman of Stormont's Employment and Learning Committee, said the issue was "particularly acute since the minister ceased funding the Community Family Support Programme, and the Collaboration and Innovation Fund".
"The minister has presided over this shambles, but the parties who voted through the 2015/16 budget also need to answer the questions coming from the community as to why their programmes have been scrapped so abruptly," he said.


A Labour peer has been seriously injured after his mobility scooter collided with a van outside Parliament.

Lord Taylor of Blackburn, 87, was left in a "stable" but critical condition after being taken to a south London hospital about 18:00 GMT on Wednesday.
Lord Taylor was the Labour leader of Blackburn Council in the 1970s before being made a Life Peer in May 1978 and becoming a businessman.
The driver stopped at the scene but was not arrested, Scotland Yard said.
The Labour peer was struck near an exit from the Houses of Parliament during rush hour on a busy junction in Westminster.
For more on this story and others in London
He became a member of Blackburn Town Council in 1954 and was its leader from 1972-76.
In 2009 Lord Taylor was suspended from the Lords for six months after allegedly offering to help a business secure favourable changes in legislation for a fee in a newspaper "sting" operation.  It was the first time in 350 years that peers have been banned in this way.
Lord Taylor and three other peers were caught speaking to undercover journalists posing as lobbyists and appeared willing to amend a Bill in return for cash.


The body of a man has been discovered on a beach at Arbroath, police have confirmed.

It was found on the beach at Victoria Park by a member of the public at about 08:40.
Officers said they have not yet formally identified the man but the family of 18-year-old Ralph Smith have been informed of the discovery.
Mr Smith, of Dundee, has been missing since he was reported to have fallen from Arbroath cliffs on February 25.
A coastguard helicopter, lifeboats and coastguard rescue teams all took part in a search for the teenager.
A Police Scotland spokeswoman said: "Officers are currently making inquiries and it is confirmed that the body of a male has been recovered.
"The identity of the male has not yet been established, but it not believed that there are any suspicious circumstances
"The family of missing person Ralph Smith from Dundee have been informed of developments."


A rescue team has criticised two poorly equipped hillwalkers who got lost in the dark on Ben Lomond and ended up on the wrong side of the mountain.

The pair lost their way on the descent and finally made their way to an isolated farm north of the mountain.
Lomond Mountain Rescue Team, who were involved in the search, said their footwear was "inadequate" and they had no torches, ice axes or crampons.
The walkers were located at Comer Farm about 22:00 on Sunday.
They were part of a group of four adults and one child that set off earlier in the day for the summit of 974m (3,195ft) Ben Lomond via the main tourist path from Rowardennan.
Three stopped before the top because of the poor weather conditions, but two younger adults in the party continued to the top.
The three waited for a while and then returned to Rowardennan. They alerted rescuers when their friends had not arrived back by about 17:00.
Members of rescue team searched the main hill paths from Rowardennan and Comer in blustery, cold weather before the pair were found.
A helicopter was used to search the lower parts of the mountain, but could not get up to summit level because of the weather.
The rescue team said the hillwalkers turned up "very cold and wet" at Comer Farm at 21.47. It is understood they lost the main path on the descent and then spotted the farmhouse lights.
A rescue team spokesman said they were not equipped for tackling a Munro in "full winter conditions". As well as being poorly equipped, the walkers' mobile phones died because the batteries had not been fully charged before they left.
The spokesman added: "It is clear that they did not fully comprehend the dangers of winter walking.
"On their descent in the dark, they fell a number of times and were extremely fortunate to survive their experience uninjured, taking into account the snow and heavy rain on the mountain last night.
"Lomond MRT would like to remind hillwalkers that, despite the recent warm and wet weather, Scotland's mountain are experiencing full winter conditions.
"Waterproof warm clothing, a fully charged phone, food and drink, a torch and axe and crampons are basics that are essential for safe travel."


The first and deputy first ministers joined FIFA officials for the opening of the redeveloped national football stadium at Windsor Park on Saturday.

Arlene Foster and Martin McGuinness were amongst fans at the Northern Ireland v San Marino FIFA World Cup qualifying match on Saturday evening.
The IFA received Â£28.75m from the Northern Ireland Executive towards the stadium redevelopment.
The venue now has a seating capacity of 18,500.
Fifa president Gianni Infantino unveiled a plaque to mark its opening.
Speaking before the match, First Minister Arlene Foster described the transformation as "remarkable".
"Northern Ireland, along with first class fans, now has a truly first class venue as its home of football," said Mrs Foster.
"There is no doubt that the Euro 2016 finals were transformative for Northern Ireland football and this wonderful new facility is reflective of our pride and ambition to take [the team] to the next level."
Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness said: "In France this summer, Michael O'Neill and his team proved they were a class act both on and off the pitch and I'm delighted they now have a world class stadium to match.
"Sport has the ability to break down barriers on and off the pitch and the IFA deserves great credit for its tireless efforts to rid sport of sectarianism, racism and homophobia.  Their work goes beyond the gates of Windsor Park and ripples out into wider society building friendships and the community."


Leeds United chairman Massimo Cellino has told Leeds Fans United he no longer wishes to sell them his majority stake in the club.

The Italian announced on Friday that he was willing to agree a takeover with supporters and forgo any profit.
The supporters' group said on Tuesday that they believed Cellino would sell them the club for £30m.
"We've been informed by the lawyers of Cellino he no longer wishes to sell to Leeds fans," LFU said in a statement.
"Our insistence on him confirming his verbal offer of exclusivity in a legally binding agreement has forced transparency on his motives. It is much better that we identify this insincerity now before we spend our shareholders' money.
"This exercise has proved our capacity to adapt to any acquisition scenario very quickly. We now know we have the capacity to do both a minority and majority deal, and it has shown that Leeds fans have a desire for fan ownership.
"We hope that Massimo will treat the club and fans with respect and honour."
Cellino, who is appealing against a second Football League ban, said at the start of the week he would no longer attend matches at Elland Road.
The Whites are 17th in the second tier after winning their first home match since 4 March against Cardiff on Tuesday.


Two County Armagh farmers have been fighting to keep the rising waters of Lough Neagh from swamping their farm.

Water levels at the lough are at a 30-year-high after recent heavy rain, which caused damage to numerous businesses on its shores.
Brothers Steven and Glen Allen farm beef cattle on a 50 acre farm near Portadown. Thirty of those acres are now under water.
The pair said long-term action needs to be taken to address the problem.
They have hired pumps and are using sandbags to keep the water from the lough out of their cattle sheds.
They claimed a build up of silt, where the River Bann flows into Lough Neagh, is causing the river to back up and flood.
Elsewhere in County Armagh, the Rivers Agency is working to protect a Grade 2 listed thatched cottage outside Portadown.
Water started coming into Dan and Kate McQuillan's home around New Year's Eve.  The couple said they will need help to save it.
Mr McQuillan said the house is suffering from multiple problems associated with the flood water.
"The electric keeps tripping, the septic tank's two feet under water, we can't use the toilet or the shower, wash dishes or clothes," he said.
"Kate keeps watch during the night to make sure the pump doesn't go off, because the minute it goes off, the place fills up with water.
"I make sure everything's okay during the day - checking the drainage and the wee trenches the boys have dug are clear."
He said he now fears the listed building could collapse.
A short distance away, a man, whose son returned from Australia at Christmas to marry and move in to a newly renovated cottage, says their home has been destroyed.
Adrian McKernan spent several years renovating the cottage, which has been badly affected by the flooding from Lough Neagh.
The Rivers Agency is pumping water away from the house and have built a sandbag barrier in an attempt to protect it.
Mr McKernan said the young couple's "dreams have been ruined".
An "urgent" ministerial meeting has been held to discuss the response to flooding across Northern Ireland.
The agriculture, regional development and environment ministers attended.
It comes after a range of flood-hit businesses on the shores of Lough Neagh questioned if enough was done to prevent rising waters brought on by winter storms.
The agriculture minister said the meeting would be a chance to "hold [government] agencies to account" over their actions in dealing with floods.


An aviation firm has confirmed its Flintshire branch is set to close after failing to find a buyer.

Marshall Aviation Services began a 45-day consultation with its 126-strong Broughton workforce last month after plans to close were first announced.
"Sadly, we have been unable to identify any viable options to continue trading as a going concern," the firm said.
Economy Secretary Ken Skates said the Welsh Government was supporting affected workers.
"This is a highly skilled workforce in an area where aerospace engineering expertise is in high demand and we remain optimistic that those affected by the decision will quickly find re-employment," he added.
In a statement, Marshall Aviation Services said the decision followed "detailed discussions with the trade unions over the last two weeks".
It added: "We will continue to work with the unions, via collective consultation, to discuss and explain the options available during this difficult time for our employees."
Unite's regional officer Dave Griffiths said: "The closure of Marshalls is a devastating blow for the workforce, their families and the economy of north east Wales.
"A facility has existed on the Hawarden Airfield since 1930, providing well-paid secure employment in the area for over 80 years.
"The majority of the workforce that remain have long service and are highly skilled.
"Unite's priority is to ensure that our members' valuable expertise and skills are not lost and are transferred to other employers in the sector."
Alyn and Deeside AM Carl Sargeant said it was "a blow for industry in the area".
He said: "I've been in touch with the cabinet secretary for economy, Ken Skates, and I know his officials are doing all they can to help my constituents during this difficult period for them.
"Marshall Aviation Services' staff are highly employable so I hope they'll be well placed to take up work at nearby companies such as Raytheon and Airbus.
"If this isn't the case the cabinet secretary has confirmed that the Welsh Government programme ReAct will be used.
"This incentivises companies to take on people who are under notice or have recently been made redundant and provides funding for any training they may need to transfer or update their skills."
Last month the company blamed "significant losses" in business for the proposed closure.
It also said the process would not impact on its other businesses in Cambridge, Kirkbymoorside, Brize Norton and Birmingham.


The foreign secretary has branded as "ridiculous" a UN panel's ruling that Julian Assange be allowed to go free, as the Wikileaks founder demanded the decision be respected.

Mr Assange - who faces extradition to Sweden over a rape claim, which he denies - claimed asylum in London's Ecuadorean embassy in 2012.
The panel said he had been "arbitrarily detained" and should get compensation.
Philip Hammond rejected the decision, accusing Mr Assange of evading justice.
Mr Assange hailed it a "significant victory" and called the decision "binding", but the UK government dismissed this.
The 44-year-old Australian was originally arrested in London in 2010 under a European Arrest Warrant issued by Sweden over rape and sexual assault allegations.
Two years later, while on bail, he claimed asylum inside the Ecuadorean embassy in Knightsbridge.
Swedish prosecutors dropped an investigation into two sex assault claims against Mr Assange last year after running out of time to question him. However, he still faces the more serious accusation of rape.
Reading a statement via a video link from the embassy, he said the opinion of the panel was "vindication", adding: "The lawfulness of my detention is now a matter of settled law."
Mr Assange said it was a "really significant victory that has brought a smile to my face".
However, Mr Hammond said Mr Assange was a "fugitive from justice", adding that he can come out "any time he chooses" but will still have to face justice in Sweden.
Mr Assange said the comments by Mr Hammond were "beneath" the minister's stature and "insulting" to the UN.
What next for Julian Assange?
Who is Julian Assange?
Julian Assange timeline
The UK Foreign Office said the report "changes nothing" and it will "formally contest the working group's opinion".
The government said while a European Arrest Warrant remained in place the UK continued to have a legal obligation to extradite Mr Assange.
In September 2014, Mr Assange complained to the UN that he was being "arbitrarily detained" as he could not leave without being arrested.
The complaint against the UK and Sweden claimed Mr Assange had been deprived of his liberty for an "unacceptable length of time".
The UN's Working Group on Arbitrary Detention insisted Mr Assange's detention "should be brought to an end, that his physical integrity and freedom of movement be respected".
The Wikileaks founder had been subjected to "different forms of deprivation of liberty" it said, initially while he was held in isolation at London's Wandsworth Prison for 10 days in 2010.
The deprivation had been "continuous" since he was initially arrested in the UK on 7 December 2010.
"Mr Assange should be afforded the right to compensation," it added.
Three members of the five-person panel found in Mr Assange's favour, while one rejected his claim and another did not take part in the investigation.
By Caroline Hawley, BBC diplomatic correspondent
Julian Assange and his supporters will see this as a significant moral victory.
The Wikileaks founder, who walked into the Ecuadorean Embassy after losing a series of appeals in British courts, now has an important panel of UN legal experts on his side.
Legally binding or not, a UN official said the decision was based on international law.
Although both Britain and Sweden are firmly sticking to their guns, they are now in an extremely awkward position.  The Swedish government has seized on the dissenting voice in the panel - who argued, as Britain does, that Mr Assange fled bail and was using the Ecuadorean embassy to evade arrest.
The call for compensation for Mr Assange is particularly controversial when there is already public anger in the UK over the cost of policing his confinement at the embassy.
The UK's permanent representative to the UN Julian Braithwaite has written to the panel expressing the government's surprise and disappointment with the outcome.
The Swedish government said Mr Assange was free to leave the embassy at any point and said he was not being deprived of his liberty.
In a statement posted on Twitter on Thursday, Mr Assange said his passport should be returned and his arrest warrant dropped if the UN panel ruled in his favour.
The UN's Working Group on Arbitrary Detention is made up of five legal experts from around the world.
Established in 1991, it has made hundreds of rulings on whether imprisonment or detention is lawful.
High profile complainants include Washington Post journalist Jason Rezaian, who was released in Iran last month.
It also offered an opinion on former pro-democracy President Mohamed Nasheed, released in the Maldives last year, and Myanmar party leader, Aung San Suu Kyi.
Timeline of the Julian Assange case
How unhealthy is living indoors?


Bayern Munich moved a huge step closer to winning a fifth successive Bundesliga title after an easy win over Borussia Dortmund in Der Klassiker.

The leaders were 2-0 up in the opening 10 minutes, Franck Ribery's first time shot breaking the deadlock.
Robert Lewandowski doubled the lead from a free-kick before Raphael Guerreiro reduced the deficit.
Arjen Robben made it 3-1 before Lewandowski's penalty sealed a convincing victory.
Bayern are 10 points clear at the top of the table with six games remaining.
Carlo Ancelotti's side look unstoppable as they close in on a record 27th German title and still have a European and domestic treble in their sights.
They entertain Ancelotti's former club Real Madrid in he Champions League quarter-finals on Wednesday (19:45 BST), while they face Borussia Dortmund again in the semi-final of the German Cup on 26 April.
Fourth-placed Dortmund, who are 18 points behind Bayern, were second best throughout as Bayern turned on the style in front of their own fans.
The hosts never looked back once Ribery opened the scoring from 16 yards after Philipp Lahm's cross.
Lewandowski's sublime free-kick added to Dortmund's problems before Guerreiro's thunderbolt into the top corner made it 2-1.
Former Chelsea winger Robben cut in from the wing to make it 3-1 and Lewandowski completed the scoring from the spot after he had been brought down by keeper Roman Burki.
Match ends, FC Bayern München 4, Borussia Dortmund 1.
Second Half ends, FC Bayern München 4, Borussia Dortmund 1.
Offside, FC Bayern München. Xabi Alonso tries a through ball, but Joshua Kimmich is caught offside.
Foul by Arturo Vidal (FC Bayern München).
Marcel Schmelzer (Borussia Dortmund) wins a free kick on the left wing.
Offside, FC Bayern München. Arturo Vidal tries a through ball, but David Alaba is caught offside.
Attempt missed. Mikel Merino (Borussia Dortmund) header from the centre of the box is close, but misses to the right. Assisted by Emre Mor with a cross following a corner.
Corner,  Borussia Dortmund. Conceded by Sven Ulreich.
Attempt saved. Christian Pulisic (Borussia Dortmund) left footed shot from the centre of the box is saved in the top left corner. Assisted by Mikel Merino.
Foul by Douglas Costa (FC Bayern München).
Matthias Ginter (Borussia Dortmund) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Attempt missed. Arturo Vidal (FC Bayern München) right footed shot from outside the box is close, but misses to the left following a corner.
Corner,  FC Bayern München. Conceded by Marcel Schmelzer.
Attempt blocked. Arjen Robben (FC Bayern München) left footed shot from the right side of the box is blocked. Assisted by Arturo Vidal.
Attempt missed. Arturo Vidal (FC Bayern München) left footed shot from outside the box is close, but misses to the right.
Corner,  FC Bayern München. Conceded by Matthias Ginter.
Substitution, FC Bayern München. Mats Hummels replaces Javi Martínez.
Joshua Kimmich (FC Bayern München) wins a free kick on the right wing.
Foul by Sokratis (Borussia Dortmund).
Attempt missed. Joshua Kimmich (FC Bayern München) right footed shot from the right side of the box is close, but misses to the right. Assisted by Arjen Robben.
Substitution, FC Bayern München. Douglas Costa replaces Franck Ribéry.
Foul by Joshua Kimmich (FC Bayern München).
Sokratis (Borussia Dortmund) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Substitution, FC Bayern München. Joshua Kimmich replaces Robert Lewandowski.
Arturo Vidal (FC Bayern München) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Foul by Emre Mor (Borussia Dortmund).
Substitution, Borussia Dortmund. Mikel Merino replaces Raphael Guerreiro.
Goal!  FC Bayern München 4, Borussia Dortmund 1. Robert Lewandowski (FC Bayern München) converts the penalty with a right footed shot to the bottom left corner.
Roman Bürki (Borussia Dortmund) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
Penalty FC Bayern München. Robert Lewandowski draws a foul in the penalty area.
Penalty conceded by Roman Bürki (Borussia Dortmund) after a foul in the penalty area.
Attempt blocked. Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (Borussia Dortmund) right footed shot from the centre of the box is blocked. Assisted by Sebastian Rode.
Franck Ribéry (FC Bayern München) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Foul by Sebastian Rode (Borussia Dortmund).
Attempt missed. Arjen Robben (FC Bayern München) left footed shot from outside the box is just a bit too high. Assisted by Thiago Alcántara.
Arturo Vidal (FC Bayern München) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
Foul by Arturo Vidal (FC Bayern München).
Matthias Ginter (Borussia Dortmund) wins a free kick in the attacking half.
Substitution, Borussia Dortmund. Emre Mor replaces Ousmane Dembélé.
Foul by Jérôme Boateng (FC Bayern München).


Police have seized a stun gun and a firearm, thought to be a blank firing pistol, at a house in east Belfast.

Blank ammunition and suspected cocaine worth Â£4,500 were also found during the search in Bryson Street on Friday.
A 22-year-old man was arrested.
He has been released on bail pending further enquiries.


English Football League chief executive Shaun Harvey has defended the new format of the Checkatrade Trophy.

For the first time since its inception in 1983, top-flight clubs with Category One academies were invited to enter a competition which has largely been for League One and League Two teams.
Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham did not enter because of fixture clashes.
And three of the first round of matches were watched by fewer than 600 fans.
Harvey spoke to BBC Sport's Simon Stone to address the criticisms.
Simon Stone: How do you respond to the negativity that surrounded the first games?
Shaun Harvey: "Unfortunately, the negativity started before the competition began in the new format. There were a number of protests by different supporter groups who felt this was the thin end of the wedge and that by allowing in Premier League under-21 sides, it was the start of allowing them into the league structure."
SS: There have been low crowds - 392 at Fleetwood v Blackburn, 460 at AFC Wimbledon, 585 at Accrington. Is that the competition or the debate around it?
SH: "It is the misconception this competition was being utilised to bring B teams into the Football League. There are more games, but more than 42,000 attended the opening games compared to 29,000 last year. The numbers at some of them were far lower than we would have liked. But the time to judge the competition is not now. It is at the end, to see how many of the objectives we set for it have been met. We wanted to create the opportunity for younger players at Category One academy clubs, and, indeed, our clubs, to gain valuable experience in senior football. The second was to reinvigorate a competition some clubs, historically, were against existing at all. It was becoming stale because the format had been the same for many years. The third objective was that, in making the changes, we have been able to increase prize money to £1.95m."
SS: I attended a game at Bolton. Fans there said there was a potential problem if a Premier League team reached the final. They have realistic opportunities to get to Wembley in the FA Cup and League Cup. This is supposed to be a competition for League One and League Two teams. Their only realistic chance of getting to Wembley is through the Checkatrade Trophy.
SH: "Remember, the entry requirement for invited clubs is there must be six players in the starting line-up under the age of 21. If those players progress, the development element of our objectives - creating opportunities for younger players to play in senior competition - would be vindicated. League One and Two clubs won 28 out of 32 games in the first round of matches. It should be possible for an invited club to get to Wembley because it is a real competition and not just another raft of friendly fixtures. Unless there is a real prize at the end of each game, nobody feels it replicates professional football fully."
SS: Would giving the winners of the Checkatrade Trophy entry into the second round of the League Cup be a better way of reinvigorating the tournament?
SH: "There are always ways to innovate using the League One and League Two clubs. We have committed at the end of this one-year pilot to review that with our clubs. But we won't be counting anything in or out. That is what we are asking everyone else to do. To keep an open mind to see whether the objectives we have set for this competition are working."
SS: Everton coach David Unsworth thought the new format provided a fantastic experience for his young players to play in a proper stadium, in a competitive environment, in a competition that meant something. Some Bolton fans didn't see the value of it. They wondered why the Football League was doing the Premier League's "dirty work". They felt the Premier League, with all its money, should be sorting out its own mess because it is those clubs who develop players who go on to the England team.
SH: "We take a more holistic view. English football, collectively, needs to try to find solutions to problems facing the whole game, not just one section of it. David Unsworth's comments are ones we would expect to hear from clubs who see this as a real opportunity to try and bridge the gap, which we all acknowledge is there, between academy and professional football. I don't accept we are doing the Premier League's dirty work."
SS: The 392 at Fleetwood might have been watching Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, Tottenham or Liverpool had they decided to compete. Chelsea are there but you are without five of the six biggest teams in this country who, by definition, would have the best young players. I understand why those clubs didn't want to compete, because it clashed with international games and they felt it wouldn't be appropriate for a sub-standard side to compete in their name. But without those five clubs, the whole concept is undermined fatally isn't it?
SH: "Only if someone has a crystal ball and can tell us where the next best young players are coming from. The big clubs all appreciated what we were trying to achieve. We were shoe-horned into those dates by the overcrowded fixture list and the requirement to play in the midweek of international football. It is a big leap to say the international players and Premier League stars of the future would only come from the top five clubs."
SS: I didn't say they would only come from those clubs. I said they would predominantly come from them.
SH: "Well they aren't at this moment in time, and they don't historically. The majority of younger players in the England team have had experience at an EFL club in one form or another. We are providing an opportunity. We fully understand why the big clubs did not want to compete. Yes, it would have been better to have all the big clubs involved. But we are certainly not crying over that particular element because the EFL and its clubs are doing all they can to help. We believe 14 of the England squad at Euro 2016 came through EFL academies. In a squad of 23, it suggests that whilst the better players may end up at the bigger clubs, the training and development is going on up and down the country. The majority of team that takes the field, hopefully, in the opening game of the Qatar 2022 World Cup may well, at this moment in time, be at EFL clubs."
Know someone who volunteers in sport and deserves recognition for their efforts? Give them the chance to shine by nominating them.
SS: Those five big names would presumably add more to attendances. Would you look at altering the structure of the competition so matches could be played at different times to allow them to compete?
SH: "By choice we would want to make the competition flexible, so as many clubs as possible could take part. However, we are well and truly fixed inside a schedule. As much as we are supportive of the Checkatrade Trophy centrally, it is never going to be more important than the league games. They have to take priority. It may be that we are trying to do too many in total. However, that should not be an excuse for not trying."
SS: Barnsley played Oxford in last season's final. It was a fantastic day for those two clubs. There were 59,230 supporters there and it generated a lot of revenue. How would you feel if Chelsea played Everton in this season's final?
SH: "If we end up with two-non EFL clubs in the final, I suspect it will be disappointing for the 48 clubs in League One and League Two. The same question is not always asked of the Football Association, whether they would be disappointed if two teams from the EFL got to the FA Cup final. I suspect they would support it in exactly the same way. Competitive football means winning teams get through to the final. If we end up with two invited clubs in the final, rather than two of our own, the chances of the pilot continuing beyond this year in this format would probably be slim. But we all acknowledge it could happen."
Take part in our new Premier League Predictor game, which allows you to create leagues with friends.


The fall in oil prices in the last 18 months is a large-scale international redistribution of income, from sellers to buyers.

We have looked at the impact on some of the losers, the oil exporters.
But what about the winners i.e. the oil importers?
For some the price fall was a great relief. It was a huge drop. The price of crude oil is less than half what it was in June last year.
A fall in the oil price is often seen as similar in its effects to a tax cut for consumers. It means they have more to spend on other goods and services, some of which will be produced by businesses in the same country.
It also reduces costs for businesses that use oil products - which means any that have goods to transport, plus the petrochemical industry which makes plastics, fertilisers, synthetic fabrics and much more using raw material made from refined oil.
It also helps any that spend a lot on the goods and services produced by these industries - farmers, for example.
Take the eurozone.  In the two years before the big price fall the region's economy contracted.  Last year it grew and is doing so again this year, though admittedly not robustly.
The fall in the oil price is not the only factor, but it surely helped.
The UK has also seen stronger growth. Yes there is an oil industry which is being hit - more on that later.
There were other factors, but the UK economy grew faster in 2014 and 2015 than it did in the previous years.  The consultants PWC estimate that an oil price settling at about $50 a barrel for five years (it's now below that) would add about 1% to the British economy. Not huge but worth having.
There are many other countries, which are net oil importers where the beneficial impact may have been masked by other developments.
In China, the decline came at the same time as the economy's growth rate was slowing for other reasons - its previous breakneck pace of expansion was not sustainable indefinitely.
Indeed the Chinese slowdown was probably one factor behind cheaper oil - though abundant supplies are generally thought to be the main element.
It is possible that China's slowdown could have been even more turbulent had the economy not had some additional support from cheaper oil.
Japan, meanwhile, is almost totally dependent on imported oil.  The fall in the price was not enough to prevent the economy slipping back into recession in the second and third quarters of this year.
Still, the Japanese economy is projected by the IMF to grow, weakly, for this year as a whole, having contracted in 2014.
There's another benefit from cheaper oil.  Many countries subsidise fuel.  The International Energy Agency estimates that in 2014 global subsidies for fossil fuels were worth almost $500bn (Â£330bn).
Of that, some $267bn went on fuels made from oil.
Cheaper oil means that governments can cut subsidies while consumers pay unchanged prices, although that will eventually mean rising fuel prices for those users when the oil market starts to rebound.
Already India, Egypt, Indonesia and others have taken the opportunity to reduce subsidies.
That's the upside. But even for net oil importers there's a downside.
Take the US.  It is a net importer but the beneficial impact is not quite as pronounced as it would have been a decade ago. The reason: the rise of shale oil.
It means that US dependence on foreign oil has declined markedly. In 2005 the US met 35% of its own crude oil needs. Last year the figure was 61%.
The rise of shale oil means there is a larger chunk of the American economy that is vulnerable to the effects of cheaper oil.
There are many countries that are net oil importers that have significant industries of their own: the UK in the North Sea, and Brazil and Indonesia, for example.
In the UK, the industry has declined.  The UK has been a net importer of crude oil since 2005 and of products made from it since 2013.
When oil prices fall these governments do lose some tax revenue. But they are likely to see gains in taxes on incomes, consumer spending and non-oil business profits.
In the case of the UK, PWC estimated the overall impact of the price fall will be more tax revenue in total.
There's also something unusual about this episode of lower oil prices that creates a potential downside even for the many oil importers with little by way of their own oilfields.
The background is one of very low general inflation in many countries, especially among the developed economies.
In the UK, the eurozone, the US and Japan central banks have an inflation target of 2% and the headline rate is well below that.
As long as it's just energy prices that are falling, it's not a major problem.
But central bankers are wary of what they call second round effects - if prices and pay agreements start to reflect an expectation that inflation is going to be be very low or even below zero.
That can lead to a damaging spiral of falling prices or deflation.
There's a risk that consumers and businesses will delay spending to take advantage of lower prices and it can aggravate debt problems.  Inflation above zero but still very low can have a similar effect.
It's not generally thought that there is any imminent danger of the UK, the eurozone or the US experiencing that problem. But the central banks are very keen to ensure that they don't.
For the most part then cheaper oil is a benefit in most countries. But some - the oil exporters - are exceptions to that rule.
And for the rest there can be some less appealing side effects that warrant careful scrutiny.


Police are investigating whether a family of seven from Bradford who travelled to Turkey on one-way tickets are trying to get to Syria.

Imran and Farzana Ameen and their five children, aged five to 15, were reported missing on Tuesday, West Yorkshire Police said.
Police said the family travelled from their home to Manchester Airport a week earlier, on 6 October.
A relative described the disappearance as "totally out of the blue".
Officers said the family, who live on Birch Lane in the West Bowling area, are believed to have flown to Antalya - though their "current whereabouts are unknown".
Police confirmed Rehan Ameen, 30, brother of Imran Ameen, is also missing. He was last seen on 29 June and also flew to Turkey.
West Yorkshire's assistant chief constable, Russ Foster, said: "We have established they travelled to Turkey on a one-way ticket.
"Although this is being treated as a missing from home inquiry, we are keeping an open mind.
"We haven't ruled out the possibility that the family may intend on travelling to Syria or Iraq."
Arshid Siddique, first cousin of both Imran and Farzana Ameen, who lives on their street, said: "The strange thing is they never saw anyone before they went, never said goodbye.
"I knew there was something not right here, then your worst fears are confirmed.
"My worst fears are they are going to a war zone, not for them, they are adults, it's for the kids."
They were last seen on 5 October.
Turkey is a known staging post for people heading for the Syrian war-zone.
Earlier this year, sisters Khadija Dawood, 30, Sugra Dawood, 34, and Zohra Dawood, 33, also from Bradford, went missing after going on an Islamic pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia with their nine children.
A smuggler told the BBC he had taken them over the border into Syria to an area held by the so-called Islamic State group.
Ishtiaq Ahmed, from the Bradford Council for Mosques, said local people were "shocked and concerned" for the family's welfare.
Speaking to BBC Radio Leeds, Mr Ahmed was asked if his organisation had done enough to dissuade people from travelling to Syria following the disappearance of the Dawoods.
He said: "I think over the years and months we have worked with our membership through mosques, faith schools and other community relations to emphasise to individuals and families that Syria is not a safe place.
"We need to know more information regarding this family - about their whereabouts and motivation. The safety and wellbeing of the children is paramount."
Police said officers were working with family relatives in the UK as well as the Turkish authorities.


Swansea City have completed the deal to sign Michu as the Spanish midfielder has agreed a three-year contract.

Rayo Vallecano accepted a £2m bid for the 26-year-old and the Premier League club will seal a third summer signing, subject to international clearance.
Michu has passed a medical and agreed personal terms to become new Swansea boss Michael Laudrup's third signing.
Laudrup said: "We're talking about a player who scored 16 goals in a small team in the Spanish league."
Michu said: "I really wanted to come to Swansea because of the coach, the style of play and the Premier League. I had other offers.
"I've always followed the Premier League from Spain and I watched a lot of Swansea games last season. They played good football and I liked their style."
He will join fellow new signings defender Chico Flores and midfielder Jonathan de Guzman on Swansea's three-match pre-season tour to the United States on Sunday following Saturday's friendly at Welsh Premier Port Talbot Town.
Unlike De Guzman and Flores, Michu has not previously worked with Laudrup but he said: "I also know how Michael Laudrup's teams play, so I'm looking forward to being part of that.
"The coach was fundamental to me joining Swansea. I remember watching him as a player - he was a machine."
The former Celta Vigo playmaker scored 15 goals in 37 games in his only season for Vallecano in La Liga last term.
Vallecano's La Liga rivals Sevilla were also believed to be interested in signing Michu while he had also been linked with Swansea's Premier League rivals Manchester United, Fulham, Stoke City, Liverpool, Southampton, Wigan and West Bromwich Albion.
Michu, an attacking midfielder, is seen as an ideal replacement for Gylfi Sigurdsson who, after an impressive loan spell at the Liberty Stadium last season, has joined Tottenham Hotspur from Hoffenheim.
"I am happy that the player wanted to come here because I was here," said Laudrup. "I have never worked with him and I haven't paid him!
"He has had a press conference in Madrid to say goodbye to Rayo Vallecano and he should join us for the tour to the USA."


The ratings agency Moody's has downgraded South Africa's sovereign debt rating.

The move comes after similar downgrades from Fitch and Standard and Poor's.
The South African economy has been struggling of late, amid industrial action on the platinum mines earlier this year and recent electricity blackouts.
South Africa's economy narrowly avoided recession in the first half of the year.
Moody's downgraded South Africa one notch to Baa2, just two notches above "junk status".
While South Africa retains an investment grade, Moody's said its decision was based on "poor medium-term growth prospects due to structural weaknesses, including ongoing energy shortages as well as rising interest rates".
Earlier this week, the state-run electricity generator, Eskom, announced the possibility of rolling blackouts, after a coal silo collapsed at a power station in the east of the country.
Last month, South Africa's finance minister, Nhlanhla Nene, slashed this year's growth forecast for the economy to 1.4%, down from a previously forecast figure of 2.7%.
The slow growth has meant that the amount of tax the South African government has been able to raise fell below expectations, which pushed the budget deficit to 4.1% of GDP.
The country is also struggling with stubbornly high unemployment at around 25%.
Nonetheless, Moody's also changed its outlook from negative to stable, indicating that another ratings downgrade is unlikely any time soon.
It said that the government has provided a commitment to rein in its debt.
Reacting to the Moody's downgrade the South African Treasury said:  "Government is committed to narrowing the budget deficit, stabilising debt and rebuilding the fiscal space that enabled South Africa to escape the worst effects of the global economic crisis."
South Africa is the continent's second largest, but most developed, economy and is much more exposed to the global financial system than its African counterparts.
Part of the slowdown in South Africa's economy is being blamed global conditions and its reliance on external capital.
Most analysts were unsurprised by the move by Moody's, given that both Standard And Poor's and Fitch had cut their ratings earlier in the year.
"Moody's has for some time now both stuck out versus the other agencies and been highlighting the weak structural position of the sovereign," said Peter Attard Montalto of Nomura.


Two people were left seriously injured after a disturbance in Edinburgh city centre.

The incident took place near the Rose Street Brewery on Rose Street at about 21:30 on Friday.
A 33-year-old woman and a 23-year-old man were taken to the city's Royal Infirmary with serious injuries and both were later released.
Two men, aged 36 and 28, have been charged in connection with the incident.
Police Scotland said they were also keen to trace two women who were seen in the area.
The first was described as white, about 5ft 8ins, in her early 20s, with long blonde hair and wearing a white jacket, black trousers and grey Christmas jumper.
The second woman was also white, about 5ft 8ins and in her early 20s.
She was wearing a cream jacket, jeans, black knee-high boots and was carrying a black shoulder bag.
Det Sgt Andy MacRae said: "We know that many of the pubs and restaurants in the area were busy with people enjoying a night out or a Christmas party and I'm today urging anyone who witnessed this disturbance to contact police immediately."


US President Barack Obama has made a rare Oval Office address after the San Bernardino shootings that left 14 dead.

He said the killings were "an act of terrorism designed to kill innocent people".
But "freedom is more powerful than fear," said President Obama, warning that falling prey to divisiveness in American society would play into the hands of extremists.
He also said the US must make it harder for potential attackers to obtain guns.
Mr Obama vowed that the US would overcome the evolving threat of terrorism, but warned that Americans "cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam".
"If we're to succeed in defeating terrorism, we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate," Mr Obama said.
He reminded his audience that Muslim-Americans were part of US society.
"And, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defence of our country. We have to remember that," he said.
The president warned that turning against America's Muslim communities would be exactly what Islamist extremists in the so-called Islamic State group want.
Media reaction to Obama's speech
Mr Obama told Americans that terrorism had entered a new phase, from large scale attacks by al-Qaeda to less complicated attacks by radicalised individuals.
He said the US would draw upon "every aspect of American power" to combat IS.
He underscored that the US and its allies have increased their bombing of Islamic State oil infrastructure and would continue to train and equip moderate rebels in Iraq and Syria.
"Our military will continue to hunt down terrorist plotters in any country where it is necessary," he said.
The president added that there are a number of things that can be done on home soil to combat terrorism.
He called for stricter gun control and said he had ordered the Departments of State and Homeland Security to review the K-1 fiance visa programme under which the female attacker in San Bernardino originally entered the US.
This was only the third Oval Office address of Mr Obama's presidency - they are reserved for events of national importance.
Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump tweeted to criticise the length of Mr Obama's statement, which lasted just over 13 minutes. "Is that all there is? We need a new President - FAST!", Trump said.
Mr Trump, who has been criticised for what many see as anti-Islamic pronouncements, added: "Well, Obama refused to say (he just can't say it), that we are at WAR with RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS."
Senator Ted Cruz, a rival of Mr Trump for the Republican presidential nomination, said: "On December 7, 1941, in response to Pearl Harbor, FDR did not give a partisan speech, rather he called on Americans to unite and 'win through to absolute victory'."
Using a different name for IS, he added: "If I am elected President, I will direct the Department of Defense to destroy ISIS. And I will shut down the broken immigration system that is letting jihadists into our country. Nothing President Obama said tonight will assist in either case."
Former governor Jeb Bush said the president's remarks were "weak". Mr Bush said: "This is the war of our time. It shouldn't be business as usual. We need a war-time Commander-in-Chief who is ready to lead this country and the free world to victory."
Responding to the address, Florida senator Marco Rubio said Mr Obama's strategy was "absurd" and called for increased surveillance efforts. "We need to be able to gather more intelligence, not less intelligence," he said.
Ohio governor John Kasich said the president's strategy was "not enough" and called for the US to deploy ground troops against IS. He said: "Without taking the fight to ISIS on the ground, ISIS won't be defeated."
Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of HP, said the speech was "vintage Obama". "No strategy, no leadership. Politics as usual," she said.
George E. Pataki, former governor of New York, controversially said Obama's address was "as believable as a hostage video". He said: "Pathetic response to the worst attack on US since 9/11."
President Barack Obama for the first time made a clear connection between a series of deadly attacks on US soil during his time in office.
The Boston Marathon bombing and shootings at a military base in Texas, an Army recruiting station in Tennessee and now in San Bernardino all represent a "new phase" of "terrorist threat" to the US, he said.
Mr Obama's goal was to convince an increasingly sceptical US public that he has a plan to address this danger - which doesn't involve large numbers of US forces in the Middle East, intrusive monitoring of American Muslims or framing the conflict as one with all of Islam.
While the president may find support for a congressional authorisation of military force to fight IS, he will anger many with his call to prevent those on the terrorist watch list from purchasing firearms and place greater limits on the sale of "powerful assault weapons".
Mr Obama may have ended his speech by urging Americans to unify around their common ideals, but there are few issues more divisive in the US than that of gun rights.
Obama's call for unity is a tall order
Mr Obama's speech was in response to a mass shooting by a married couple that left 14 dead.
Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 29, opened fire on an office Christmas party and were later killed in a shootout with police.
In his speech, the president characterised IS as "thugs and killers", adding: "The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it."
The group said in a radio broadcast that the couple that carried out the attack were IS supporters, but gave no indication that IS was involved in its planning.
The FBI is also looking into reports Malik posted a message on Facebook pledging allegiance to IS around the time of the attacks.
Who were the attackers? What we know about Farook and Malik
'It's crazy they lived next door' Neighbours tell the BBC of their shock that the attackers lived nearby
Politicians 'shamed' for offering prayers Does prayer do anything in the wake of a shooting?
Who were the victims? Diverse backgrounds of the 14 people killed
What makes this shooting different? While the US has seen many mass shootings this one is unusual
Becoming radicalised under the radar The problem facing intelligence officials
The couple used handguns and semi-automatic weapons that had been legally purchased in the US, police say.
Bomb equipment, weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition were later found in their home.
It is the deadliest mass shooting in the US since 26 people were killed at a school in Connecticut in 2012.
The authorities said there was no indication so far the killers were part of an "organised group or formed part of a broader terrorist cell".
President Obama has used Oval Office speeches sparingly, compared with previous presidents. His previous two addresses, both in 2010, covered the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the end of combat operations in Iraq.
Other significant Oval Office addresses include:
The Wall Street Journal says Mr Obama's use of the Oval speech to cover the terror threat "underscores how serious the issue has become for both the White House and the increasingly unsettled country".


This is a significant moment in the turbulent history of efforts to constrain Iran's nuclear programme.

Opinion has been bitterly divided on the merits of even seeking a deal with Tehran.
Many on Capitol Hill, for example, have appeared to oppose any deal, preferring - if you strip away their arguments - to seek regime change in Tehran.
In contrast, the overwhelming verdict of nuclear and arms control experts is that diplomacy has delivered a result.
Their preference was always for an agreement that avoided what they saw a bad choice between military action and perhaps a fraying but almost certainly less effective sanctions regime in the future.
This, it must be stressed, is not yet a complete deal. Difficult weeks of detailed drafting lie ahead. But it's a framework on which all parties are agreed. That in itself is an important outcome. Yet this is not a moment for euphoria.
Nobody should be under any illusions that Iran has significantly changed its attitude towards its nuclear programme or its longer-term nuclear ambitions.
This agreement, if codified and implemented in full, will constrain Iran's nuclear programme for some 10 to 15 years. It appears to contain some new and important verification provisions to allow international inspectors greater oversight of what Iran is actually doing.
But the agreement falls far short of the initial western goal of rolling back Iran's nuclear programme. This may be a question of a crisis delayed rather than averted. What it does is buy time - during which a lot can happen.
If all goes well, the nuclear deal will reduce a key source of friction between Iran and the West.
There will still be many other areas of disagreement. Indeed, Iran remains the rising regional power and its influence in many Arab capitals ranging from Damascus and  Baghdad to Beirut and Sanaa - let alone its human rights record and alleged support for terrorism - all suggest many other avenues for continuing tensions with Washington.
Negotiations have not been easy and they will only get harder. But a deal seems to have suited all sides.
Iran gets vital sanctions relief. Tehran's critics get significant constraints on its nuclear activities. And with so much else going on in this crisis-ridden region - the struggle against Islamic State in which the US and Iran are objectively on the same side and the fighting in Yemen where they are clearly not - means that taking the nuclear problem off the chess-board for a period of time is probably a helpful development.
What was expected from these talks was a fairly bland announcement that a framework agreement had been reached. In contrast the US State Department has been quick to publish a lengthy list of what it calls the "Parameters for a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action" regarding Iran's nuclear programme.
They make interesting reading and represent a clear effort to sell the deal to a sceptical Congress. Too much detail though may make it harder for Iranian diplomats to sell the deal at home in the face of scepticism from political hard-liners.  On the face of it Iran has made some significant concessions.
Many of these constraints will be in place for 10 years and some will last for 15.
In return
Nonetheless, the level of detail is impressive and appears to have convinced nuclear experts that it does indeed provide the year-long warning of a potential Iranian break-out that has been the diplomats' goal. That is seen as sufficient time for any Iranian effort to throw aside the deal and push towards enriching sufficient material for a bomb to be quickly spotted and action taken.
Strong verification provisions, along with continued intelligence efforts should also be sufficient to prevent an Iranian "sneak-out" - a clandestine effort to do the same thing.
This may not convince many of the critics. An Israeli government spokesman described any agreement stemming from this framework as "a historic mistake". Huge questions remain. How will any Iranian infringements be responded to? Can sanctions once suspended really be re-imposed? And what level of transgression is required to provoke this?
But if it all works then Iran too only gains. It retains a significant nuclear infrastructure which it can expand once the agreement expires. And it gets vital relief from sanctions that have crippled its economy.
For now this could be a diplomatic win-win. But it is not a resolution to the fundamental questions posed by Iran's nuclear programme which relate as much to its foreign policy and military ambitions as to its proclaimed desire for nuclear power.