Welcome to Mrs. Schmidtbauer's Math class
  • Home
  • CMP
  • Resources
  • PLN Blog
  • About Me
  • Contact

Rethinking Education #3

12/3/2016

2 Comments

 


​DAN MEYER - TED TALK


Especially in math, teachers find themselves trying to “sell a product to a market that doesn’t want it but is forced by law to buy it.” Dan Meyer comes up with advertisements that makes our product more desirable. When you see students having a lack of initiative, perseverance, or retention, are discouraged by word problems, or are eager to know what formula to use, then you know that you are approaching math reasoning all wrong. Mr. Meyer makes a good point that textbooks like to lay everything out for the students and fail in producing the “need” for them to find interest in the problem or even need to use critical thinking in order to solve the problem. Instead, they give you every piece of information that you need and encourage you to use the formula they provide. Students are able to pass the class simply by knowing how to decode a textbook and plugging things into a formula without having to actually learn any math. The reasoning behind the math and the methods we use to get to the answer normally holds more value than the answer itself. That way, when you find yourself with a similar problem, you understand the methods and reasoning you need to find the answer. I love when Dan Meyer says “math serves the conversation, conversation doesn’t serve the math.” If we force feed students the material, then it almost guarantees the won’t retain it because they did not have a need much less an interest to learn it. As Albert Einstein said, “the formulation of the problem is often more essential than its solution.” I encourage you to watch this short video to see how Mr. Meyer alters a textbook to create the need for math and presents it in a way that puts every student on a level playing field of intuition. Leave your thoughts in the comments below!

T. (2010, April 12). Dan Meyer at TEDxNYED. Retrieved November 28, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlvKWEvKSi8&index=14&list=PLbRLdW37G3oMquOaC-HeUIt6CWk-FzaGp

2 Comments
Ben Tyler
12/3/2016 04:05:38 pm

Megan,

Great post! I think this whole conversation does a great deal to bring up the problems with textbooks in general. Rarely will students be able to find all the answers they need in one location. While it is nice to help guide their learning during their education, it does nothing to reinforce their own investigation and understanding; instead leading them to more of a 'plug and chug' mentality. We need to have students think, not just fumble around looking for an obvious answer.

Reply
David Willman
12/3/2016 04:32:47 pm

I agree with what you have written. When you mentioned that the text books fail engage the students with the layout of the questions it reminded of something about textbooks. It is important to remember that the textbooks are designed to be sold to and bought by the schools, not the students. This is why as teachers we may look at the problems and like the layouts or the scaffolding of problems, but those very problems don't appeal to students. For example, every section of the textbook we are using contains the exact CCSS it relates to. I find this very helpful, but I have yet to find a student that has cared at all about this feature.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Megan Schmidtbauer
    Single Subject Teacher
    ​Wife, Mother, Friend

    Archives

    October 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016

  • Home
  • CMP
  • Resources
  • PLN Blog
  • About Me
  • Contact
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.