Typhoid Mary and the Ethics of Forced Isolation

Kathy Copeland Padden
4 min readMay 11, 2020
Photo by Forbes

After years of forced isolation as an asymptomatic carrier of typhoid fever, Mary Mallon, better remembered as “Typhoid Mary,” regained her freedom(albeit briefly) on February 19, 1910.

The catch? Mary could never work as a cook again.

Mary acquiesced and signed an affidavit stating that she

“is prepared to change her occupation (that of cook), and will give assurance that she will upon her release take such hygienic precautions as will protect those with whom she comes in contact, from infection.”

She also agreed to report in with the New York Board of Health every 90 days.

And with that, she was free to go.

Photo by Georgia Virtual School

Mary Mallon, a 37-year-old Irish immigrant, was employed as a cook for the wealthy Warren family on Long Island during the summer of 1906. At the end of August, one of the daughters fell ill with typhoid fever. Then, in quick succession, six of the eleven people in the household came down with the disease.

Mr. Warren hired George Soper, a civil engineer with past experience in researching typhoid outbreaks (or so he said, anyway) to look…

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Kathy Copeland Padden
Kathy Copeland Padden

Written by Kathy Copeland Padden

is a music fanatic, classic film aficionado, and history buff surfing the End Times wave like a boss. Come along!

Responses (1)

What are your thoughts?

Intresting article but with a heap of assumptions Now haven’t a clue about US law but in the UK you can and will be detained and false to isolate if found to be a carrier of COVID 19 until it can’t be discovered in your body. As yes as far as I have…...

1